What's the best choice Palit GeForce RTX 2070 JetStream or ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 Evo? Which graphics card is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
Palit GeForce RTX 2070 JetStream has a base frequency of 1.410 GHz. Memory size 8 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q4/2018.
ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 Evo has a base frequency of 1.410 GHz. Memory size 8 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2019.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
place
Common positions Palit GeForce RTX 2070 JetStream GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
place
Common positions ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 Evo GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Palit GeForce RTX 2070 JetStream
Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Palit GeForce RTX 2070 JetStream and ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 Evo, chip, information processing units.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
36
TU106
64
2304
144
Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.
448 GB/s
256 bit
8 GB
1750 MHz
GDDR6
Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.
1410 MHz
1650 MHz + 2%
1620 MHz
Yes
Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.
-
175 W
-
Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system Palit GeForce RTX 2070 JetStream and ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 Evo.
Air cooling
Radial
1 x 80 mm
-
0 dB / Silent
-
Connectivity and connections.
2 × DisplayPort 1.4a
-
2.2
2 × HDMI 2.0b
4
PCIe 3.0 x16
1 x 8-Pin
-
-
Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.
12_2
Yes
No LED lighting
7680 × 4320
Yes
Built-in support for video and image compression standards.
No
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode
The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices
113 mm
268 mm
2 PCIe-Slots
-
-
Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 Evo and Palit GeForce RTX 2070 JetStream.
data sheet
-
TURBO-RTX2070-8G-EVO
12 nm
Q2/2019
Shared tests with results for both models: 2
Each row is a separate graphics subtest. Scores are not game FPS.
| Test and settings | Palit GeForce RTX 2070 JetStream | ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 Evo | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark – Steel Nomad — Steel Nomad Score / DirectX 12 | 2095 points Base GPU test: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 VRAM: 8 GBOS: Windows 11Graphics API: DirectX 12HVCI: enabledApplication version unreported | 2095 points Base GPU test: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 VRAM: 8 GBOS: Windows 11Graphics API: DirectX 12HVCI: enabledApplication version unreported | 0.0 % |
| 3DMark – Time Spy — Graphics Score / DirectX 12 | 8874 points Base GPU test: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 VRAM: 8 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3DOS: Windows 11Graphics API: DirectX 12HVCI: enabledApplication version unreported | 8874 points Base GPU test: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 VRAM: 8 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3DOS: Windows 11Graphics API: DirectX 12HVCI: enabledApplication version unreported | 0.0 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
A base GPU test is a reference for cards using that GPU and the same memory capacity. Board overclocking, cooling and power limits can change the result.
Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Palit GeForce RTX 2070 JetStream and ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 Evo.
Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Game frame rates
Archived results. The original measurement method and test conditions have not been verified.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
