Select processor 1
Select processor 2
MSI GeForce RTX 5090 32G GAMING TRIO OC
AMD Radeon RX 7400

MSI GeForce RTX 5090 32G GAMING TRIO OC vs AMD Radeon RX 7400. Specifications

User rating
star star star star star
Released
—
MSI GeForce RTX 5090 32G GAMING TRIO OC
MSI GeForce RTX 5090 32G GAMING TRIO OC
Released
—
User rating
star star star star star
AMD Radeon RX 7400

Family illustration.

AMD Radeon RX 7400

What's the best choice MSI GeForce RTX 5090 32G GAMING TRIO OC or AMD Radeon RX 7400? Which graphics card is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

MSI GeForce RTX 5090 32G GAMING TRIO OC Memory size 32 GB. Memory type GDDR7.

AMD Radeon RX 7400 Memory size 8 GB. Memory type GDDR6.

Differences

  • More memory

    300% more memory

    32 GB left arrow 8 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions MSI GeForce RTX 5090 32G GAMING TRIO OC GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Radeon RX 7400 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
MSI GeForce RTX 5090 32G GAMING TRIO OC MSI GeForce RTX 5090 32G GAMING TRIO OC
AMD Radeon RX 7400 AMD Radeon RX 7400
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards MSI GeForce RTX 5090 32G GAMING TRIO OC and AMD Radeon RX 7400, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 left arrow AMD Radeon RX 7400
  • Board Manufacturer
    MSI left arrow -
  • Board Model
    MSI GeForce RTX 5090 32G GAMING TRIO OC left arrow -
  • Board SKU
    G5090-32GTC left arrow -
  • CUDA Cores
    21760 left arrow -
  • GPU Chip
    GeForce RTX 5090 left arrow -
  • AI Accelerators
    - left arrow 56
  • Compute Units
    - left arrow 28
  • Execution Units
    - left arrow 28
  • Ray Accelerators
    - left arrow 28
  • Render Output Units
    - left arrow 64
  • Shader
    - left arrow 1792
Memory settings

Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.

  • Memory Bus
    512 bit left arrow 128 bit
  • Memory Data Rate
    28 Gbps left arrow 10.8 Gbps
  • Memory Size
    32 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR7 left arrow GDDR6
  • Infinity Cache
    - left arrow 32 MB
  • Memory Bandwidth
    - left arrow 173 GB/s
Clock frequency

Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.

  • Boost Clock
    2482 MHz (GAMING / SILENT mode) left arrow -
  • Extreme Performance (MSI Center)
    2497 MHz left arrow -
Thermal Management

Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.

  • Power Consumption
    575 W left arrow -
  • System Power Supply
    1000 W (PSU recommendation) left arrow 450 W (System power requirement)
  • GPU Power
    - left arrow Up to 43 W
  • Typical Board Power
    - left arrow 55 W
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • DisplayPort Ports
    3 × DisplayPort 2.1b left arrow -
  • HDMI Ports
    1 × HDMI 2.1b left arrow -
  • PCIe Interface
    PCI Express 5.0 left arrow -
  • Power Connectors
    1 x 16-pin left arrow -
  • DisplayPort Version
    - left arrow 2.1
  • HDMI Version
    - left arrow 2.1
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Dimensions
    359 x 149 x 70 mm left arrow -
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU AMD Radeon RX 7400 and MSI GeForce RTX 5090 32G GAMING TRIO OC.

  • Official source
    https://www.msi.com/Graphics-Card/GeForce-RTX-5090-32G-GAMING-TRIO-OC/Specification left arrow https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/desktops/radeon/7000-series/amd-radeon-rx-7400.html
  • Verified on
    2026-09-30 left arrow 2026-09-30

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Latest comparisons