Select processor 1
Select processor 2
MSI GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC
ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent

MSI GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC vs ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2017
MSI GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC
MSI GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC
Released
Q2/2017
Overall score
star star star star star
ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent
ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent

What's the best choice MSI GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC or ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

MSI GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC has a maximum frequency of 1.265 GHz+ 3 %. Memory size 2 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q2/2017.

ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent has a maximum frequency of 1.228 GHz. Memory size 2 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q2/2017.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    3036 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 3% better clock speed

    1.265 GHz+ 3 % left arrow 1.228 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions MSI GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    3079 place
  • Battlefield 5
    3016 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    3041 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    3040 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    3083 place
  • Battlefield 5
    3020 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    3037 place

Specifications

Technical data
MSI GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC MSI GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC
ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards MSI GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC and ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 left arrow NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
  • GPU Chip
    GP108-300-A1 left arrow GP108-300-A1
  • Execution units
    3 left arrow 3
  • Shader
    384 left arrow 384
  • Render Output Units
    16 left arrow 16
  • Texture Units
    24 left arrow 24
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    2 GB left arrow 2 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Speed
    1.502 GHz left arrow 1.502 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    48 GB/s left arrow 48 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    64 bit left arrow 64 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards MSI GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC and ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    1.265 GHz+ 3 % left arrow 1.228 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.518 GHz+ 3 % left arrow 1.506 GHz+ 3 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow 1.468 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    30 W left arrow 30 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    left arrow
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system MSI GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC and ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent.

  • Fan-Type
    -- left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Passive left arrow Passive
  • Fan 1
    -- left arrow --
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    0 dB left arrow 0 dB
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    2 left arrow 2
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow --
  • DP Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • DVI Ports
    1 left arrow 1
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    147 mm left arrow 173 mm
  • Height
    100 mm left arrow 69 mm
  • Width
    37 mm left arrow 40 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    384 g left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent and MSI GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 4 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 4
  • Release date
    Q2/2017 left arrow Q2/2017
  • Release price
    -- left arrow --
  • Structure size
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Part-no
    -- left arrow GT1030-SL-2G-BRK
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between MSI GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC and ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
1.17
MSI GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC
1.16
ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a realistic game, with a built-in benchmark, very suitable as a test for graphics cards
1 fps (avg)
MSI GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC
1 fps (avg)
ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
1 fps (avg)
MSI GeForce GT 1030 2GH OC
1 fps (avg)
ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent
-->

Latest comparisons