Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Matrox LUMA A380
ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 3GB

Matrox LUMA A380 vs ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 3GB. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A380
Matrox LUMA A380
Released
Q3/2016
Overall score
star star star star star
ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 3GB
ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 3GB

What's the best choice Matrox LUMA A380 or ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 3GB? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Matrox LUMA A380 has a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz-11 %. Memory size 6 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.

ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 3GB has a maximum frequency of 1.569 GHz+ 4 %. Memory size 3 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q3/2016.

Differences

Videokards Reasons to consider
Matrox LUMA A380
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 22% better clock speed

    2.000 GHz-11 % left arrow 1.569 GHz+ 4 %
  • More memory

    50% more memory

    6 GB left arrow 3 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Matrox LUMA A380 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2844 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2694 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 3GB GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2724 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2670 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2581 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    2554 place

Specifications

Technical data
Matrox LUMA A380 Matrox LUMA A380
ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 3GB ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 3GB
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A380 and ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 3GB, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    Intel Arc A380 Graphics left arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
  • GPU Chip
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow GP106-300-A1
  • Shader
    1024 left arrow 1152
  • Render Output Units
    32 left arrow 48
  • Texture Units
    64 left arrow 72
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    6 GB left arrow 3 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Speed
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 2.002 GHz
  • Memory Interface
    96 bit left arrow 192 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A380 and ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 3GB. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    2.000 GHz-11 % left arrow 1.569 GHz+ 4 %
  • Boost Clock
    2.050 GHz left arrow 1.809 GHz+ 6 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow 1.785 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    75 W (Reference) left arrow 120 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 8-Pin left arrow 1 x 6-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system Matrox LUMA A380 and ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 3GB.

  • Fan-Type
    Radial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    1 x 70 mm left arrow 2 x 90 mm
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    0 dB left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    -- left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    -- left arrow 2x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    4x DP v2.1 left arrow 2x DP v1.4
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow 1
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    254 mm left arrow 242 mm
  • Height
    127 mm left arrow 130 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 43 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    1 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 3GB and Matrox LUMA A380.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q3/2016
  • Structure size
    6 nm left arrow 16 nm
  • Part-no
    -- left arrow DUAL-GTX1060-O3G
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Matrox LUMA A380 and ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 3GB.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
9 fps (avg)
Matrox LUMA A380
4.17
ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 3GB
FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
3.74
Matrox LUMA A380
15 fps (avg)
ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 3GB
-->

Latest comparisons