Select processor 1
Select processor 2
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G

INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2022
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact
Released
Q2/2018
Overall score
star star star star star
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G

What's the best choice INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact or GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact has a maximum frequency of 1.740 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2022.

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G has a maximum frequency of 1.417 GHz+ 2 %. Memory size 3 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q2/2018.

Differences

  • Higher clock speed

    Around 19% better clock speed

    1.740 GHz left arrow 1.417 GHz+ 2 %
  • More memory

    25% more memory

    4 GB left arrow 3 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    3062 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    2234 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2958 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2925 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2924 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2825 place

Specifications

Technical data
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 left arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
  • GPU Chip
    TU117-150 (Turing) left arrow GP107-301-A1
  • Execution units
    8 left arrow 6
  • Shader
    512 left arrow 768
  • Render Output Units
    16 left arrow 24
  • Texture Units
    32 left arrow 48
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 3 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Speed
    12 Gbps left arrow 1.752 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    96 GB/s left arrow 84 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    64 bit left arrow 96 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    1.740 GHz left arrow 1.417 GHz+ 2 %
  • Boost Clock
    1.785 GHz left arrow 1.582 GHz+ 4 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow 1.556 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 75 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    90 °C left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    left arrow
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    1 x 90 mm left arrow 2 x 80 mm
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    -- left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    2x DP v1.4a left arrow 1x DP v1.4
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow 1
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    196 mm left arrow 191 mm
  • Height
    113 mm left arrow 111 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 36 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G and INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2022 left arrow Q2/2018
  • Release price
    -- left arrow --
  • Structure size
    12 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Part-no
    N16301-04D6-1177VA19 left arrow GV-N1050OC-3GD
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
1.83
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1630 Compact
2.43
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 OC 3G
-->

Latest comparisons