What's the best choice Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 GHOST OC or INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT? Which graphics card is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 GHOST OC has a base frequency of 1.485 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q2/2019.
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT has a base frequency of 1.485 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q2/2019.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
Common positions Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 GHOST OC GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
Common positions INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 GHOST OC
Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 GHOST OC and INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT, chip, information processing units.
Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.
Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.
Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.
Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 GHOST OC and INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT.
Connectivity and connections.
Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.
Built-in support for video and image compression standards.
The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices
Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT and Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 GHOST OC.
Shared tests with results for both models: 5
Each row uses one game, resolution, test suite and graphics mode.
| Test and settings | Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 GHOST OC | INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gaming suite 2019 / Far Cry 5 / 1920x1080 / Maximum settings / Rendering unreported | 49.5 FPS Base GPU test: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 VRAM: 4 GBMemory type: GDDR5Test CPU: Intel Core i7-8700KSystem RAM: 32 GB DDR4-3200 16-16-16-38-1T (dual-rank)OS: Windows 10 1809Graphics API: DirectX 11Driver: 430.39 | 49.5 FPS Base GPU test: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 VRAM: 4 GBMemory type: GDDR5Test CPU: Intel Core i7-8700KSystem RAM: 32 GB DDR4-3200 16-16-16-38-1T (dual-rank)OS: Windows 10 1809Graphics API: DirectX 11Driver: 430.39 | Complete test conditions unreported |
| Gaming suite 2019 / Hellblade: Senua's Sacrifice / 1920x1080 / Maximum settings / Rendering unreported | 43.8 FPS Base GPU test: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 VRAM: 4 GBMemory type: GDDR5Test CPU: Intel Core i7-8700KSystem RAM: 32 GB DDR4-3200 16-16-16-38-1T (dual-rank)OS: Windows 10 1809Graphics API: DirectX 11Driver: 430.39 | 43.8 FPS Base GPU test: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 VRAM: 4 GBMemory type: GDDR5Test CPU: Intel Core i7-8700KSystem RAM: 32 GB DDR4-3200 16-16-16-38-1T (dual-rank)OS: Windows 10 1809Graphics API: DirectX 11Driver: 430.39 | Complete test conditions unreported |
| Gaming suite 2019 / Kingdom Come: Deliverance / 1920x1080 / Maximum settings / Rendering unreported | 33.9 FPS Base GPU test: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 VRAM: 4 GBMemory type: GDDR5Test CPU: Intel Core i7-8700KSystem RAM: 32 GB DDR4-3200 16-16-16-38-1T (dual-rank)OS: Windows 10 1809Graphics API: DirectX 11Driver: 430.39 | 33.9 FPS Base GPU test: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 VRAM: 4 GBMemory type: GDDR5Test CPU: Intel Core i7-8700KSystem RAM: 32 GB DDR4-3200 16-16-16-38-1T (dual-rank)OS: Windows 10 1809Graphics API: DirectX 11Driver: 430.39 | Complete test conditions unreported |
| Gaming suite 2019 / Overwatch / 1920x1080 / Maximum settings / Rendering unreported | 72.8 FPS Base GPU test: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 VRAM: 4 GBMemory type: GDDR5Test CPU: Intel Core i7-8700KSystem RAM: 32 GB DDR4-3200 16-16-16-38-1T (dual-rank)OS: Windows 10 1809Graphics API: DirectX 11Driver: 430.39 | 72.8 FPS Base GPU test: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 VRAM: 4 GBMemory type: GDDR5Test CPU: Intel Core i7-8700KSystem RAM: 32 GB DDR4-3200 16-16-16-38-1T (dual-rank)OS: Windows 10 1809Graphics API: DirectX 11Driver: 430.39 | Complete test conditions unreported |
| Gaming suite 2019 / Shadow of the Tomb Raider / 1920x1080 / Maximum settings / Rendering unreported | 34.5 FPS Base GPU test: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 VRAM: 4 GBMemory type: GDDR5Test CPU: Intel Core i7-8700KSystem RAM: 32 GB DDR4-3200 16-16-16-38-1T (dual-rank)OS: Windows 10 1809Graphics API: DirectX 12Driver: 430.39 | 34.5 FPS Base GPU test: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 VRAM: 4 GBMemory type: GDDR5Test CPU: Intel Core i7-8700KSystem RAM: 32 GB DDR4-3200 16-16-16-38-1T (dual-rank)OS: Windows 10 1809Graphics API: DirectX 12Driver: 430.39 | Complete test conditions unreported |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
A base GPU test is a reference for cards using that GPU and the same memory capacity. Board overclocking, cooling and power limits can change the result.
Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 GHOST OC and INNO3D GeForce GTX 1650 COMPACT.
Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Game frame rates
Archived results. The original measurement method and test conditions have not been verified.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.