Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC

Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V vs KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2019
Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V
Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V
Released
Q3/2016
Overall score
star star star star star
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC

What's the best choice Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V or KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V has a maximum frequency of 1.485 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q2/2019.

KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC has a maximum frequency of 1.354 GHz+ 5 %. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q3/2016.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2844 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 9% better clock speed

    1.485 GHz left arrow 1.354 GHz+ 5 %

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2786 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2738 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2690 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    2873 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2567 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2770 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2951 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2868 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2796 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    2608 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    2705 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2816 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2072 place

Specifications

Technical data
Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V and KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR5) left arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
  • GPU Chip
    TU117-300-A1 left arrow GP107-400-A1
  • Execution units
    14 left arrow 6
  • Shader
    896 left arrow 768
  • Render Output Units
    32 left arrow 32
  • Texture Units
    56 left arrow 48
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Speed
    2 GHz left arrow 1.752 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    128 GB/s left arrow 112 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    128 bit left arrow 128 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V and KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    1.485 GHz left arrow 1.354 GHz+ 5 %
  • Boost Clock
    1.860 GHz+ 12 % left arrow 1.468 GHz+ 5 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    1.665 GHz left arrow
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 75 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 6-Pin left arrow 1 x 6-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V and KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    2 x 90 mm left arrow 2 x 80 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    -- left arrow --
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    1x DP v1.4 left arrow 1x DP v1.4
  • DVI Ports
    1 left arrow 2
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    3840x2160 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    iGame Energy Core left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    240 mm left arrow 245 mm
  • Height
    132 mm left arrow 126 mm
  • Width
    40 mm left arrow 39 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC and Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2019 left arrow Q3/2016
  • Release price
    -- left arrow --
  • Structure size
    12 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Part-no
    -- left arrow 50IQH8DVN6EK
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V and KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
3.33
Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V
2.25
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a realistic game, with a built-in benchmark, very suitable as a test for graphics cards
22 fps (avg)
Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V
18 fps (avg)
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
13 fps (avg)
Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V
11 fps (avg)
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC
Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
The Autolykos algorithm, on which Ergo cryptocurrency is based, allows not only modern GPUs to be used for mining, but also the past generation of GPUs
28 MH/s
Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V
31 MH/s
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC
Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
Hashrate mining Ravencoin cryptocurrency on the KawPoW algorithm is fastest on modern video cards
10 MH/s
Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra 4G-V
6 MH/s
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC
-->

Latest comparisons