Select processor 1
Select processor 2
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650
XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 vs XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2019
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650
Released
Q3/2019
Overall score
star star star star star
XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB
XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB

What's the best choice ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 or XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 has a maximum frequency of 1.485 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q2/2019.

XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB has a maximum frequency of 1.469 GHz. Memory size 8 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q3/2019.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2923 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 1% better clock speed

    1.485 GHz left arrow 1.469 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2826 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2817 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2746 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    2834 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2695 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2337 left arrow score
  • More memory

    50% more memory

    8 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    1937 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2274 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2246 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    2258 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    1829 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2309 place

Specifications

Technical data
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650
XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 and XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR5) left arrow AMD Radeon RX 590
  • GPU Chip
    TU117-300-A1 left arrow Polaris 30
  • Execution units
    14 left arrow 36
  • Shader
    896 left arrow 2304
  • Render Output Units
    32 left arrow 32
  • Texture Units
    56 left arrow 144
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Speed
    2 GHz left arrow 2 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    128 GB/s left arrow 256 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    128 bit left arrow 256 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 and XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    1.485 GHz left arrow 1.469 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.695 GHz+ 2 % left arrow 1.580 GHz+ 2 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    1.665 GHz left arrow
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 225 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow 235 W
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 6-Pin left arrow 1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 and XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    2 x 80 mm left arrow 2 x 100 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    -- left arrow --
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    3 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    1x DP v1.4 left arrow 3x DP v1.4
  • DVI Ports
    1 left arrow 1
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    3840x2160 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    200 mm left arrow 270 mm
  • Height
    112 mm left arrow 124 mm
  • Width
    47 mm left arrow 53 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB and ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2019 left arrow Q3/2019
  • Release price
    -- left arrow --
  • Structure size
    12 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Part-no
    TUF-GTX1650-4G-GAMING left arrow RX-590P8DFD6
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 and XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
3.04
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650
7.28
XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a realistic game, with a built-in benchmark, very suitable as a test for graphics cards
20 fps (avg)
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650
41 fps (avg)
XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
12 fps (avg)
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650
25 fps (avg)
XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB
Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
The Autolykos algorithm, on which Ergo cryptocurrency is based, allows not only modern GPUs to be used for mining, but also the past generation of GPUs
28 MH/s
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650
74 MH/s
XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB
Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
Hashrate mining Ravencoin cryptocurrency on the KawPoW algorithm is fastest on modern video cards
9 MH/s
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650
12 MH/s
XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8GB
-->

Latest comparisons