Select processor 1
Select processor 2
ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC
AMD Radeon RX 6800

ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC vs AMD Radeon RX 6800. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2019
ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC
ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC
Released
Q4/2020
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD Radeon RX 6800
AMD Radeon RX 6800

What's the best choice ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC or AMD Radeon RX 6800? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC has a maximum frequency of 1.685 GHz+ 5 %. Memory size 8 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q3/2019.

AMD Radeon RX 6800 has a maximum frequency of 1.700 GHz. Memory size 16 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q4/2020.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2451 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2400 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2448 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2336 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    2172 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    2627 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2490 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    2207 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    1941 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    601 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 1% better clock speed

    1.700 GHz left arrow 1.685 GHz+ 5 %
  • More memory

    50% more memory

    16 GB left arrow 8 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Radeon RX 6800 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    749 place
  • Battlefield 5
    407 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    478 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    660 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    902 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    710 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    436 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    432 place

Specifications

Technical data
ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC
AMD Radeon RX 6800 AMD Radeon RX 6800
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC and AMD Radeon RX 6800, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT left arrow AMD Radeon RX 6800
  • GPU Chip
    Navi 14 XTX left arrow Navi 21
  • Execution units
    22 left arrow 60
  • Shader
    1408 left arrow 3840
  • Render Output Units
    32 left arrow 96
  • Texture Units
    88 left arrow 240
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    8 GB left arrow 16 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    1.75 GHz left arrow 2 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    224 GB/s left arrow 512 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    128 bit left arrow 256 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC and AMD Radeon RX 6800. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    1.685 GHz+ 5 % left arrow 1.700 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.845 GHz left arrow 2.105 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    1.737 GHz+ 1 % left arrow 1.815 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    130 W left arrow 250 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow 285 W
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC and AMD Radeon RX 6800.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    2 x 90 mm left arrow 3 x 85 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    40 dB left arrow 35 dB
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4 left arrow 2x DP v1.4a
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow 1
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_2
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow Non addressable LED
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    241 mm left arrow 267 mm
  • Height
    127 mm left arrow 120 mm
  • Width
    42 mm left arrow --
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU AMD Radeon RX 6800 and ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q3/2019 left arrow Q4/2020
  • Release price
    -- left arrow 579 $
  • Structure size
    7 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Part-no
    RX5500XT CLD 8GO left arrow --
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow --

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC and AMD Radeon RX 6800.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
5.2
ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC
16.17
AMD Radeon RX 6800
3DMark Benchmark
3DMark is designed for gamers, overclockers and system builders who want to get the most out of their hardware
4594
ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC
14930
AMD Radeon RX 6800
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a realistic game, with a built-in benchmark, very suitable as a test for graphics cards
35 fps (avg)
ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC
90 fps (avg)
AMD Radeon RX 6800
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
23 fps (avg)
ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC
63 fps (avg)
AMD Radeon RX 6800
Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
Ethash is an algorithm for mining Ethereum cryptocurrency that makes the most of the GPU
28 MH/s
ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC
58 MH/s
AMD Radeon RX 6800
Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
The Autolykos algorithm, on which Ergo cryptocurrency is based, allows not only modern GPUs to be used for mining, but also the past generation of GPUs
40 MH/s
ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC
110 MH/s
AMD Radeon RX 6800
Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
Hashrate mining Ravencoin cryptocurrency on the KawPoW algorithm is fastest on modern video cards
10 MH/s
ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC
28 MH/s
AMD Radeon RX 6800
Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
VertCoin cryptocurrency can be mined on both Nvidia and AMD and is interesting because it mines perfectly on old GPUs like GTX1050, R9 290 and even GTX970
0.35 MH/s
ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC
0.85 MH/s
AMD Radeon RX 6800
-->

Latest comparisons