Quel est le meilleur choix ? Intel Core i9-13900HX ou Intel Core i9-13980HX? Quel est le processeur le plus rapide ?
Nous avons préparé un comparatif pour vous aider à choisir le meilleur processeur. Comparez leurs spécifications et leurs benchmarks.
Intel Core i9-13900HX has a base frequency of 2.00 GHz (5.40 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. Sorti en Q1/2023.
Intel Core i9-13980HX has a base frequency of 2.10 GHz (5.60 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. Sorti en Q1/2023.
Raisons de considérer Positions communes Intel Core i9-13900HX CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
Raisons de considérer Positions communes Intel Core i9-13980HX CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
Intel Core i9-13900HX
Informations générales sur les processeurs comparés, la série, la génération et le segment de marché.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics n'affecte pas les performances du CPU, il effectue le travail de la carte graphique en son absence ou sur les appareils mobiles.
Codecs intégrés utilisés pour coder et décoder le contenu. Accélère considérablement les opérations requises.
Types, canal quantité de RAM supportée par Intel Core i9-13980HX et Intel Core i9-13900HX. Selon les cartes mères, des fréquences de mémoire supérieures ou inférieures peuvent être prises en charge.
Comparez les exigences du TDP Intel Core i9-13900HX et Intel Core i9-13980HX Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, instructions supplémentaires supportées par Intel Core i9-13900HX et Intel Core i9-13980HX, les technologies des machines virtuelles et la technologie des processus.
Shared tests with results for both models: 10
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900HX | Intel Core i9-13980HX | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 377.58323 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 392.232359 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +3.9 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 291.153005 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 370.906612 samples/min Submissions: 9 | +27.4 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 358.271086 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 424.282467 samples/min Submissions: 16 | +18.4 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 347.602066 samples/min Submissions: 73 | 335.267439 samples/min Submissions: 18 | -3.5 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 330.685394 samples/min Submissions: 25 | 344.501215 samples/min Submissions: 26 | +4.2 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 294.767578 samples/min Submissions: 62 | 315.406209 samples/min Submissions: 44 | +7.0 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 320.871804 samples/min Submissions: 57 | 359.268813 samples/min Submissions: 58 | +12.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 313.229039 samples/min Submissions: 48 | 372.441003 samples/min Submissions: 44 | +18.9 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 395.004333 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 252.715053 samples/min Submissions: 5 | -36.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 361.636386 samples/min Submissions: 88 | 385.360995 samples/min Submissions: 54 | +6.6 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900HX | 1675 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900HX | 121.4 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13980HX | 3681.424269 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / G614JV Duration: 271.634 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900HX | 9669.926721 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 10M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 1034.134 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900HX | 29376 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900HX | 2057 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900HX | 11164 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900HX | 790 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900HX | 4502 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900HX | 299 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
En vous basant sur les résultats de plusieurs benchmarks, vous pouvez estimer avec plus de précision la différence de performance entre Intel Core i9-13900HX et Intel Core i9-13980HX.
Comparez les valeurs des tests synthétiques et choisissez le meilleur processeur !
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.