Samsung Exynos 2200
Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU)
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU). Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2022
Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Exynos 2200
Released
Q3/2021
User rating
star star star star star
Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU)
Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU)

What's the best choice Samsung Exynos 2200 or Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU)? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Samsung Exynos 2200 has a base frequency of 2.80 GHz. 8 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Released in Q1/2022.

Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU) has a base frequency of 3.20 GHz. 10 / 10 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 30 W. Released in Q3/2021.

Differences


Positions in all rankings

Common positions Samsung Exynos 2200 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    257 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    491 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    202 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    63 left arrow place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 14% better clock speed

    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.80 GHz
  • More number of cores

    2 more cores

    10 left arrow 8

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU) CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    78 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    111 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    70 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    74 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    11 place

Specifications

Technical data
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU) Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU)
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Samsung Exynos 2200 left arrow Apple M1
  • Family
    Samsung Exynos left arrow Apple M series
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 1
  • Predecessor
    Samsung Exynos 2100 left arrow -
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • A-Core
    1x Cortex-X2 left arrow 8x Firestorm
  • A-Core Frequency
    2.8 GHz left arrow -
  • B-Core
    3x Cortex-A710 left arrow 2x Icestorm
  • B-Core Frequency
    2.52 GHz left arrow -
  • C-Core
    4x Cortex-A510 left arrow -
  • C-Core Frequency
    1.82 GHz left arrow -
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 10
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 10
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Base Frequency
    - left arrow 3.2 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    - left arrow No turbo
  • Turbo Frequency (10 Cores)
    - left arrow No turbo
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow -
  • Execution units
    24 left arrow 224
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 1
  • GPU Frequency
    1300 MHz left arrow 1300 MHz
  • GPU name
    Samsung Xclipse 920 (RDNA 2) left arrow Apple M1 Pro (14 Core)
  • GPU Turbo
    1300 MHz left arrow No turbo
  • Max. displays
    0 left arrow 3
  • Max. GPU Memory
    4 GB left arrow 32 GB
  • Release date
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q3/2021
  • Shader
    384 left arrow 1792
  • Technology
    4 nm left arrow 5 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    Decode left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    Conflicting source values: Decode / Encode | No left arrow Conflicting source values: Decode | Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU) and Samsung Exynos 2200. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Max. Memory
    12 GB left arrow 32 GB
  • Memory Bandwidth
    51.2 GB/s left arrow -
  • Memory channels
    4 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    LPDDR5-6400 left arrow LPDDR5-6400
  • PCIe
    - left arrow 4.0
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Samsung Exynos 2200 and Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU) Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    - left arrow 30 W
  • TDP up
    - left arrow 40 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Samsung Exynos 2200 and Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU), virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Cortex-X2/-A710/-A510 left arrow M1
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv9-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    - left arrow Rosetta 2 x86-Emulation
  • L2-Cache
    - left arrow 28 MB
  • Operating systems
    Android left arrow -
  • Part Number
    SM-S908B left arrow APL 1103
  • Release date
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q3/2021
  • Technology
    4 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow None

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Samsung Exynos 2200 and Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU).

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

1186.000000
Samsung Exynos 2200
1768.000000
Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

3586.000000
Samsung Exynos 2200
12574.000000
Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games

Higher values are better in this metric.

1422.000000
Samsung Exynos 2200
4580.000000
Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU)

Latest comparisons