Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Samsung Exynos 9610
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Samsung Exynos 9610. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Released
Q4/2018
User rating
star star star star star
Samsung Exynos 9610
Samsung Exynos 9610

What's the best choice Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 or Samsung Exynos 9610? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 has a base frequency of 1.80 GHz. 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Released in Q2/2019.

Samsung Exynos 9610 has a base frequency of 1.70 GHz. 8 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Released in Q4/2018.

Differences

  • Higher clock speed

    Around 6% better clock speed

    1.80 GHz left arrow 1.70 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1150 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    946 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1147 place
  • AnTuTu 8 benchmark
    82 place
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 15 % higher specified turbo frequency

    2.30 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Samsung Exynos 9610 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1142 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1013 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1543 place
  • AnTuTu 8 benchmark
    83 place

Specifications

Technical data
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 662/665 left arrow Samsung Exynos 9600
  • Family
    Qualcomm Snapdragon left arrow Samsung Exynos
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 3
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • A-Core
    4x Kryo 260 Gold left arrow 4x Cortex-A73
  • B-Core
    4x Kryo 260 Silver left arrow 4x Cortex-A53
  • Base Frequency
    1.8 GHz left arrow 1.7 GHz
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 8
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    2 GHz left arrow 2.3 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (8 Cores)
    1.8 GHz left arrow 2.3 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    12.1 left arrow 12
  • Execution units
    0 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    6 left arrow Bifrost 2
  • GPU Frequency
    - left arrow 850 MHz
  • GPU name
    Qualcomm Adreno 610 left arrow ARM Mali-G72 MP3
  • GPU Turbo
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Max. displays
    0 left arrow 1
  • Max. GPU Memory
    4 GB left arrow 2 GB
  • Release date
    Q2/2019 left arrow Q3/2017
  • Shader
    128 left arrow 48
  • Technology
    11 nm left arrow 16 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    Conflicting source values: Decode | Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Samsung Exynos 9610 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 665. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 0
  • Memory type
    LPDDR3-1866LPDDR4X-1866 left arrow LPDDR4X-1600
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 and Samsung Exynos 9610 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 and Samsung Exynos 9610, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Kryo 260 left arrow Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • Part Number
    SM6125 left arrow -
  • Release date
    Q2/2019 left arrow Q4/2018
  • Technology
    11 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow None

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 and Samsung Exynos 9610.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

321.000000
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
329.000000
Samsung Exynos 9610
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

1326.000000
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
1164.000000
Samsung Exynos 9610
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games

Higher values are better in this metric.

273.000000
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
94.000000
Samsung Exynos 9610
AnTuTu 8 benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark tests ARM processors by simulating browser and application performance for Android, iOS, AI, SoC

Higher values are better in this metric.

171683.000000
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
171465.000000
Samsung Exynos 9610

Latest comparisons