Intel Xeon W-3375
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon W-3375 vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600G. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2021
Intel Xeon W-3375
Intel Xeon W-3375
Released
Q3/2020
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G

What's the best choice Intel Xeon W-3375 or AMD Ryzen 5 4600G? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Xeon W-3375 has a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz. 38 Cores. Power consumption of 270 W. Released in Q3/2021.

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G has a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. 6 Cores. Power consumption of 65 W. Released in Q3/2020.

Differences

Intel Xeon W-3375 Reasons to consider
Intel Xeon W-3375
Report a bug
  • More number of cores

    32 times more cores

    38 left arrow 6

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon W-3375 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    21 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    23 place
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G Reasons to consider
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    414 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 32% better clock speed

    3.70 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 5 % better overclocked clock speed

    4.20 GHz left arrow 4.00 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.24 times less performance per watt

    65 W left arrow 270 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 5 4600G CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    218 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    179 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    185 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    201 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    149 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    205 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    358 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    459 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    159 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    355 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Xeon W-3375 Intel Xeon W-3375
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Intel Xeon W left arrow AMD Ryzen
  • Generation
    8 left arrow 3
  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon W-3300 left arrow AMD Ryzen 4000G
  • Predecessor
    Intel Xeon W-3275 left arrow AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
  • Successor
    -- left arrow AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    2.50 GHz left arrow 3.70 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    38 left arrow 6
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.00 GHz left arrow 4.20 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    72 left arrow 12
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow AMD Radeon 7 Graphics (Renoir)
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 1.90 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    left arrow 7
  • Shader
    left arrow 448
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 2 GB
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 3
  • Generation
    left arrow 9
  • DirectX Version
    left arrow 12
  • Technology
    left arrow 7 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q1/2020
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and Intel Xeon W-3375. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-3200 left arrow DDR4-3200
  • Max. Memory
    4096 GB left arrow 32 GB
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    8 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    4.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    64 left arrow 12
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Xeon W-3375 and AMD Ryzen 5 4600G to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    270 W left arrow 65 W
  • TDP down
    -- left arrow 45 W
  • Tjunction max.
    -- left arrow 100 °C
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon W-3375 and Intel Xeon W-3375, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • L2-Cache
    47.50 MB left arrow --
  • L3-Cache
    57.00 MB left arrow 8.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Ice Lake W left arrow Renoir (Zen 2)
  • Technology
    10 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 4189 left arrow AM4
  • Release date
    Q3/2021 left arrow Q3/2020

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Xeon W-3375 and AMD Ryzen 5 4600G.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Latest comparisons