Intel Xeon W-3275M
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon W-3275M vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2019
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Released
Q1/2018
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

What's the best choice Intel Xeon W-3275M or AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Xeon W-3275M has a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz. 28 Cores. Power consumption of 205 W. Released in Q2/2019.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has a maximum frequency of 3.60 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 65 W. Released in Q1/2018.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    35 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    24 times more cores

    28 left arrow 4
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 15% better overclocked clock speed

    4.60 GHz left arrow 3.90 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon W-3275M CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    261 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    34 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    1 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    23 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    2 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    70 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    72 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    575 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 31% better clock speed

    3.60 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.32 times less performance per watt

    65 W left arrow 205 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    296 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    269 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    332 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    288 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    394 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    363 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    699 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    744 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    150 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    86 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    230 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    168 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    182 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    4 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    569 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon W-3275M
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Intel Xeon W left arrow AMD Ryzen
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 1
  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 left arrow AMD Ryzen 2000G
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    2.50 GHz left arrow 3.60 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    28 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.60 GHz left arrow 3.90 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    56 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 1.25 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    left arrow 11
  • Shader
    left arrow 704
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 2 GB
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 3
  • Generation
    left arrow 8
  • DirectX Version
    left arrow 12
  • Technology
    left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q1/2018
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Intel Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2933 left arrow DDR4-2933
  • Max. Memory
    2048 GB left arrow 64 GB
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    6 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    64 left arrow 12
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Xeon W-3275M and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    205 W left arrow 65 W
  • TDP down
    -- left arrow 46 W
  • Tjunction max.
    -- left arrow 95 °C
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon W-3275M and Intel Xeon W-3275M, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • L3-Cache
    38.50 MB left arrow 4.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Cascade Lake W left arrow Raven Ridge (Zen)
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 3647 left arrow AM4
  • Release date
    Q2/2019 left arrow Q1/2018

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Xeon W-3275M and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Maxon's Cinebench R23 SC is a cross-platform test suite for macOs and Windows uses one CPU core, with no hypetrading
1107
Intel Xeon W-3275M
1021
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Maxon's Cinebench R23 MC is a cross-platform test suite for macOs and Windows using a multi-core and hyperthreading
28051
Intel Xeon W-3275M
4800
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 SC is a high load CPU test for long tasks on a desktop or notebook PC, uses one CPU core, with no hypetrading
437
Intel Xeon W-3275M
391
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 MC is a high load CPU test for long tasks on a desktop or notebook PC, using a multi-core and hyperthreading
11020
Intel Xeon W-3275M
1922
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
1096
Intel Xeon W-3275M
854
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
17196
Intel Xeon W-3275M
3174
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
36622
Intel Xeon W-3275M
9520
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

Latest comparisons