Intel Xeon W-3235
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon W-3235 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2019
Intel Xeon W-3235
Intel Xeon W-3235
Released
Q2/2019
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

What's the best choice Intel Xeon W-3235 or AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Xeon W-3235 has a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. 12 Cores. Power consumption of 180 W. Released in Q2/2019.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 65 W. Released in Q2/2019.

Differences

Intel Xeon W-3235 Reasons to consider
Intel Xeon W-3235
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    318 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    8 times more cores

    12 left arrow 4
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 7% better overclocked clock speed

    4.50 GHz left arrow 4.20 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon W-3235 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    279 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    78 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    441 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    143 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    151 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    106 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    618 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 11% better clock speed

    3.70 GHz left arrow 3.30 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.36 times less performance per watt

    65 W left arrow 180 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    276 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    267 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    298 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    286 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    278 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    342 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    596 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    655 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    112 place
  • Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
    82 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    544 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Xeon W-3235 Intel Xeon W-3235
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Intel Xeon W left arrow AMD Ryzen
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 left arrow AMD Ryzen 3000G
  • Successor
    Intel Xeon W-3335 left arrow --
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    3.30 GHz left arrow 3.70 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    12 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.50 GHz left arrow 4.20 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    24 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 1.40 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    left arrow 11
  • Shader
    left arrow 704
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 2 GB
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 3
  • Generation
    left arrow 8
  • DirectX Version
    left arrow 12
  • Technology
    left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q1/2018
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Intel Xeon W-3235. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2933 left arrow DDR4-2933
  • Max. Memory
    1024 GB left arrow 64 GB
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    6 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    64 left arrow 12
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Xeon W-3235 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    180 W left arrow 65 W
  • TDP down
    -- left arrow 45 W
  • Tjunction max.
    -- left arrow 95 °C
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon W-3235 and Intel Xeon W-3235, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • L3-Cache
    19.25 MB left arrow 4.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Cascade Lake W left arrow Picasso (Zen+)
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 12 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 3647 left arrow AM4
  • Release date
    Q2/2019 left arrow Q2/2019

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Xeon W-3235 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 SC is a high load CPU test for long tasks on a desktop or notebook PC, uses one CPU core, with no hypetrading
424
Intel Xeon W-3235
412
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 MC is a high load CPU test for long tasks on a desktop or notebook PC, using a multi-core and hyperthreading
5742
Intel Xeon W-3235
1969
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
1096
Intel Xeon W-3235
940
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
11996
Intel Xeon W-3235
3660
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
25745
Intel Xeon W-3235
9955
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

Latest comparisons