Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400. Specifications

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2021
Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y
Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y
Released
Q3/2008
User rating
star star star star star
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400

What's the best choice Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y or Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y has a base frequency of 2.80 GHz. 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 105 W. Released in Q2/2021.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 has a base frequency of 2.66 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 95 W. Released in Q3/2008.

Differences

  • Higher clock speed

    Around 5% better clock speed

    2.80 GHz left arrow 2.66 GHz
  • More number of cores

    4 more cores

    8 left arrow 4
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    95 W left arrow 105 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1085 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1014 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1023 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon Silver 4300 left arrow Intel Core 2 Quad Q8000/Q9000
  • Family
    Intel Xeon Silver left arrow Intel Core2 Duo
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 2
  • Predecessor
    No left arrow No
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop
  • Successor
    No left arrow No
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    2.8 GHz left arrow 2.66 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 4
  • CPU Threads
    16 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Yes left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    3.6 GHz left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Max. Memory
    6144 GB left arrow 16 GB
  • Memory channels
    8 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR4-2666 left arrow DDR2-800 / DDR3-1066
  • PCIe
    4 x 64 left arrow -
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    100 °C left arrow 90 °C
  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    105 W left arrow 95 W
  • TDP (PL2)
    No left arrow No
  • TDP down
    No left arrow No
  • TDP up
    No left arrow No
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Ice Lake left arrow Yorkfield
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 left arrow MMX, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1
  • L2-Cache
    No left arrow 6 MB
  • L3-Cache
    12 MB left arrow No
  • Release date
    Q2/2021 left arrow Q3/2008
  • Socket
    LGA 4189 left arrow LGA 775
  • Technology
    10 nm left arrow 45 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-d

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.

Latest comparisons