Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
Intel Core i5-1135G7
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 vs Intel Core i5-1135G7. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2013
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
Released
Q3/2020
User rating
star star star star star
Intel Core i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-1135G7

What's the best choice Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 or Intel Core i5-1135G7? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 has a base frequency of 3.00 GHz. 10 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 130 W. Released in Q3/2013.

Intel Core i5-1135G7 has a base frequency of 2.40 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 15 W. Released in Q3/2020.

Differences

  • Higher clock speed

    Around 25% better clock speed

    3.00 GHz left arrow 2.40 GHz
  • More number of cores

    6 more cores

    10 left arrow 4

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    886 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    216 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    744 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    261 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    515 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    77 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    439 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    117 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    205 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    189 left arrow place
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 17 % higher specified turbo frequency

    4.20 GHz left arrow 3.60 GHz
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    15 W left arrow 130 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core i5-1135G7 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    128 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    217 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    90 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    265 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    187 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    362 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    160 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    396 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
Intel Core i5-1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon E5 v2 left arrow Intel Core i 1100G/11000U
  • Family
    Intel Xeon E5 left arrow Intel Core i5
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 11
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Mobile
  • Successor
    Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 left arrow -
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    3 GHz left arrow 2.4 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    10 left arrow 4
  • CPU Threads
    20 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    3.6 GHz left arrow 4.2 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (10 Cores)
    3.3 GHz left arrow -
  • Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
    - left arrow 3.8 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    - left arrow 12
  • Execution units
    - left arrow 80
  • Generation
    - left arrow 12
  • GPU Frequency
    - left arrow 400 MHz
  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7)
  • GPU Turbo
    No turbo left arrow 1300 MHz
  • Max. displays
    - left arrow 4
  • Max. GPU Memory
    - left arrow 16 GB
  • Release date
    - left arrow Q3/2020
  • Shader
    - left arrow 640
  • Technology
    - left arrow 10 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
  • H.264 / AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core i5-1135G7 and Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Max. Memory
    - left arrow 64 GB
  • Memory channels
    4 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR3-1866 left arrow DDR4-3200
  • PCIe lanes
    40 left arrow 4
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 4.0
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 and Intel Core i5-1135G7 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    - left arrow 100 °C
  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    130 W left arrow 15 W
  • TDP down
    - left arrow 12 W
  • TDP up
    - left arrow 28 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 and Intel Core i5-1135G7, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Ivy Bridge EP left arrow Tiger Lake U
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
  • L3-Cache
    25 MB left arrow 8 MB
  • Release date
    Q3/2013 left arrow Q3/2020
  • Socket
    LGA 2011 left arrow BGA 1526
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 4 threads / windows

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core i5-1135G7 2760.014021 H/s RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 4 threads / windows
System RAM: 16 GB
OS: Windows NT 10.0
Motherboard: LENOVO / LNVNB161216
Duration: 362.317 s
User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 and Intel Core i5-1135G7.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

720.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
1355.000000
Intel Core i5-1135G7
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

6668.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
4904.000000
Intel Core i5-1135G7
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks

Higher values are better in this metric.

16394.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
9822.000000
Intel Core i5-1135G7

Latest comparisons