Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Intel Celeron J3160
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Intel Celeron J3160. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2016
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Released
Q1/2016
User rating
star star star star star
Intel Celeron J3160
Intel Celeron J3160

What's the best choice Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Intel Celeron J3160? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 has a base frequency of 2.40 GHz. 14 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 120 W. Released in Q1/2016.

Intel Celeron J3160 has a base frequency of 1.60 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 6 W. Released in Q1/2016.

Differences

  • Higher clock speed

    Around 50% better clock speed

    2.40 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz
  • More number of cores

    10 more cores

    14 left arrow 4
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 47% higher specified turbo frequency

    3.30 GHz left arrow 2.24 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    478 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    189 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    521 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    135 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    210 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    50 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    271 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    60 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    149 place
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    6 W left arrow 120 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron J3160 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1014 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    980 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1229 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1189 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1402 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    839 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    769 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    757 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    728 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    293 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1044 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Intel Celeron J3160 Intel Celeron J3160
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon E5 v4 left arrow Intel Celeron J3000/N3000
  • Family
    Intel Xeon E5 left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 8
  • Predecessor
    Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 left arrow -
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    2.4 GHz left arrow 1.6 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    14 left arrow 4
  • CPU Threads
    28 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Yes left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    3.3 GHz left arrow 2.24 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (14 Cores)
    2.7 GHz left arrow -
  • Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
    - left arrow 2.24 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    - left arrow 12
  • Execution units
    - left arrow 12
  • Generation
    - left arrow 8
  • GPU Frequency
    - left arrow 320 MHz
  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow Intel HD Graphics 400
  • GPU Turbo
    No turbo left arrow 700 MHz
  • Max. displays
    - left arrow 3
  • Max. GPU Memory
    - left arrow 8 GB
  • Release date
    - left arrow Q1/2015
  • Shader
    - left arrow 96
  • Technology
    - left arrow 14 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Celeron J3160 and Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    4 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
  • PCIe lanes
    40 left arrow 4
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 2.0
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Intel Celeron J3160 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    120 W left arrow 6 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Intel Celeron J3160, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Broadwell E left arrow Braswell
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    35 MB left arrow 2 MB
  • Release date
    Q1/2016 left arrow Q1/2016
  • Socket
    LGA 2011-3 left arrow BGA 1170
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Intel Celeron J3160.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

Higher values are better in this metric.

138.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
38.000000
Intel Celeron J3160
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

Higher values are better in this metric.

2004.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
136.000000
Intel Celeron J3160
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

3887.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
943.000000
Intel Celeron J3160
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

50246.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
3161.000000
Intel Celeron J3160
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

1.680000
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
0.440000
Intel Celeron J3160
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

24.680000
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
1.670000
Intel Celeron J3160
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks

Higher values are better in this metric.

19864.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
1950.000000
Intel Celeron J3160

Latest comparisons