Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
AMD Ryzen 9 7900
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2016
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
Released
Q1/2023
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen 9 7900
AMD Ryzen 9 7900

What's the best choice Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 or AMD Ryzen 9 7900? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 has a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz. 10 Cores. Power consumption of 90 W. Released in Q1/2016.

AMD Ryzen 9 7900 has a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz. 12 / 24 Cores. Power consumption of 65 W. Released in Q1/2023.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    690 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    506 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    216 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    924 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    556 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    182 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    84 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    437 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    94 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    364 place
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 Reasons to consider
AMD Ryzen 9 7900
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    123 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 37% better clock speed

    3.80 GHz left arrow 2.40 GHz
  • More number of cores

    About 1.2 times more cores

    12 left arrow 10
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 37 % better overclocked clock speed

    5.40 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.72 times less performance per watt

    65 W left arrow 90 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 9 7900 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    24 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    28 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    12 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    12 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    589 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    21 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 AMD Ryzen 9 7900
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Intel Xeon E5 left arrow AMD Ryzen 9
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 6
  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon E5 v4 left arrow AMD Ryzen 7000
  • Predecessor
    Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 left arrow AMD Ryzen 9 5900
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    2.40 GHz left arrow 3.80 GHz
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow AMD Radeon Graphics (Raphael)
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.40 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 2.20 GHz
  • Execution units
    left arrow 2
  • Shader
    left arrow 128
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 3
  • Generation
    left arrow 9
  • Technology
    left arrow 5 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q3/2022
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2133 left arrow DDR5-5200
  • Max. Memory
    left arrow 128 GB
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    4 left arrow 2 (Dual Channel)
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 and AMD Ryzen 9 7900 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    90 W left arrow 65 W
  • Tjunction max.
    -- left arrow 95 °C
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2,FMA3, AVX2, AVX512
  • L2-Cache
    -- left arrow 12.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    25.00 MB left arrow 64.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Broadwell E left arrow Raphael (Zen 4)
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 2011-3 left arrow AM5 (LGA 1718)
  • Release date
    Q1/2016 left arrow Q1/2023

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 and AMD Ryzen 9 7900.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Latest comparisons