Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
AMD A6-3670K
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 vs AMD A6-3670K. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2013
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
Released
Q4/2011
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD A6-3670K
AMD A6-3670K

What's the best choice Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 or AMD A6-3670K? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 has a maximum frequency of 3.60 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 82 W. Released in Q2/2013.

AMD A6-3670K has a maximum frequency of 2.70 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 100 W. Released in Q4/2011.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    599 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 25% better clock speed

    3.60 GHz left arrow 2.70 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    82 W left arrow 100 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    328 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    384 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    275 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    249 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    142 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    223 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    700 place
AMD A6-3670K Reasons to consider
AMD A6-3670K
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1382 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD A6-3670K CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1177 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    592 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    452 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1044 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
AMD A6-3670K AMD A6-3670K
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Intel Xeon E3 left arrow AMD A
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 1
  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon E3 v3 left arrow AMD A6-3000
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    3.60 GHz left arrow 2.70 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.00 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (4 Cores)
    4.00 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow AMD Radeon HD 6530D
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.44 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    left arrow 5
  • Shader
    left arrow 320
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 1 GB
  • Generation
    left arrow 3
  • DirectX Version
    left arrow 11
  • Technology
    left arrow 32 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q4/2010
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD A6-3670K and Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1600 left arrow DDR3-1600
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 and AMD A6-3670K to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    82 W left arrow 100 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 left arrow SSE3, SSE4a
  • L3-Cache
    8.00 MB left arrow 4.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Haswell S left arrow Llano (K10)
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 1150 left arrow FM1
  • Release date
    Q2/2013 left arrow Q4/2011

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 and AMD A6-3670K.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
1.81
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
0.81
AMD A6-3670K
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
8.21
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
3.23
AMD A6-3670K
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
10260
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
3288
AMD A6-3670K

Latest comparisons