Intel Pentium N6415
Samsung Exynos 7904
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Pentium N6415 vs Samsung Exynos 7904. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2021
Intel Pentium N6415
Intel Pentium N6415
Released
Q1/2019
User rating
star star star star star
Samsung Exynos 7904
Samsung Exynos 7904

What's the best choice Intel Pentium N6415 or Samsung Exynos 7904? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Pentium N6415 has a base frequency of 1.20 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 6.5 W. Released in Q1/2021.

Samsung Exynos 7904 has a base frequency of 1.60 GHz. 8 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Released in Q1/2019.

Differences

  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 67% higher specified turbo frequency

    3.00 GHz left arrow 1.80 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Pentium N6415 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1241 place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 33% better clock speed

    1.60 GHz left arrow 1.20 GHz
  • More number of cores

    4 more cores

    8 left arrow 4

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Samsung Exynos 7904 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1193 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1070 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1604 place
  • AnTuTu 8 benchmark
    94 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Pentium N6415 Intel Pentium N6415
Samsung Exynos 7904 Samsung Exynos 7904
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Pentium N6200/J6400/N6400 left arrow Samsung Exynos 7872/7884/7885/7904
  • Family
    Intel Pentium left arrow Samsung Exynos
  • Generation
    11 left arrow 2
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • A-Core
    - left arrow 2x Cortex-A73
  • B-Core
    - left arrow 6x Cortex-A53
  • Base Frequency
    1.2 GHz left arrow 1.6 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 8
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    3 GHz left arrow 1.8 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
    2.2 GHz left arrow -
  • Turbo Frequency (8 Cores)
    - left arrow 1.8 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow 11
  • Execution units
    16 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    11 left arrow Bifrost 1
  • GPU Frequency
    350 MHz left arrow 770 MHz
  • GPU name
    Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Elkhart Lake) left arrow ARM Mali-G71 MP2
  • GPU Turbo
    800 MHz left arrow No turbo
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 1
  • Max. GPU Memory
    - left arrow 2 GB
  • Release date
    Q1/2021 left arrow Q2/2016
  • Shader
    128 left arrow 32
  • Technology
    10 nm left arrow 16 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    Decode left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Samsung Exynos 7904 and Intel Pentium N6415. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Max. Memory
    64 GB left arrow -
  • Memory channels
    4 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR4-3200LPDDR4X-4266 left arrow LPDDR4-1866
  • PCIe lanes
    8 left arrow -
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow -
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Pentium N6415 and Samsung Exynos 7904 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    6.5 W left arrow -
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Pentium N6415 and Samsung Exynos 7904, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Elkhart Lake left arrow Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow -
  • L2-Cache
    1.5 MB left arrow -
  • Release date
    Q1/2021 left arrow Q1/2019
  • Socket
    BGA 1296 left arrow -
  • Technology
    10 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow None

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Pentium N6415 and Samsung Exynos 7904.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games

Higher values are better in this metric.

215.000000
Intel Pentium N6415
53.000000
Samsung Exynos 7904

Latest comparisons