Intel Core i7-2620M
AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Core i7-2620M vs AMD Ryzen 5 3500. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2011
Intel Core i7-2620M
Intel Core i7-2620M
Released
Q4/2019
User rating
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen 5 3500
AMD Ryzen 5 3500

What's the best choice Intel Core i7-2620M or AMD Ryzen 5 3500? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

Intel Core i7-2620M has a base frequency of 2.70 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 35 W. Released in Q1/2011.

AMD Ryzen 5 3500 has a base frequency of 3.60 GHz. 6 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in Q4/2019.

Differences

  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    35 W left arrow 65 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core i7-2620M CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1188 place
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 Reasons to consider
AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 33% better clock speed

    3.60 GHz left arrow 2.70 GHz
  • More number of cores

    4 more cores

    6 left arrow 2
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 21 % higher specified turbo frequency

    4.10 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 5 3500 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    169 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    207 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    148 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    267 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    300 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    371 place
  • Monero Hashrate kH/s
    63 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    288 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Core i7-2620M Intel Core i7-2620M
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 AMD Ryzen 5 3500
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Core i 2000M left arrow AMD Ryzen 3000
  • Family
    Intel Core i7 left arrow AMD Ryzen
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 3
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Desktop / Server
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    2.7 GHz left arrow 3.6 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 6
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 6
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Yes left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    3.4 GHz left arrow 4.1 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow -
  • Turbo Frequency (6 Cores)
    - left arrow 4 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    10.1 left arrow -
  • Execution units
    12 left arrow -
  • Generation
    6 left arrow -
  • GPU Frequency
    650 MHz left arrow -
  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics 3000 left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU Turbo
    1300 MHz left arrow No turbo
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow -
  • Release date
    Q1/2011 left arrow -
  • Shader
    96 left arrow -
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow -
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 5 3500 and Intel Core i7-2620M. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow Yes
  • Max. Memory
    16 GB left arrow -
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR3-1066DDR3-1333 left arrow DDR4-3200
  • PCIe lanes
    16 left arrow 20
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow 4.0
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Core i7-2620M and AMD Ryzen 5 3500 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    100 °C left arrow 95 °C
  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    35 W left arrow 65 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Core i7-2620M and AMD Ryzen 5 3500, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Sandy Bridge H left arrow Matisse (Zen 2)
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • L3-Cache
    4 MB left arrow 32 MB
  • Release date
    Q1/2011 left arrow Q4/2019
  • Socket
    BGA 1023 left arrow AM4
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT left arrow AMD-V, SVM

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs
Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core i7-2620M

AMD Ryzen 5 3500

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

RandomX / XMRig 6.21.0 / 1M / 6 threads / windows

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 3822.746873 H/s RandomX / XMRig 6.21.0 / 1M / 6 threads / windows
System RAM: 64 GB
OS: Windows NT 10.0
Motherboard: HP / 8643
Duration: 261.592 s
User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

Latest comparisons