Intel Core i5-11600T
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Core i5-11600T vs AMD Ryzen 7 3800X. Specifications

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2021
Intel Core i5-11600T
Intel Core i5-11600T
Released
Q3/2019
User rating
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

What's the best choice Intel Core i5-11600T or AMD Ryzen 7 3800X? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

Intel Core i5-11600T has a base frequency of 1.70 GHz. 6 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 35 W. Released in Q1/2021.

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X has a base frequency of 3.90 GHz. 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 105 W. Released in Q3/2019.

Differences

  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    35 W left arrow 105 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core i5-11600T CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    476 place
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X Reasons to consider
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    91 left arrow place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 129% better clock speed

    3.90 GHz left arrow 1.70 GHz
  • More number of cores

    2 more cores

    8 left arrow 6
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 10 % higher specified turbo frequency

    4.50 GHz left arrow 4.10 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 7 3800X CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    132 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    94 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    102 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    98 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    74 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    117 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    217 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    152 place
  • Monero Hashrate kH/s
    29 place
  • Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
    34 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    92 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Core i5-11600T Intel Core i5-11600T
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Core i 11000 left arrow AMD Ryzen 3000
  • Family
    Intel Core i5 left arrow AMD Ryzen
  • Generation
    11 left arrow 3
  • Predecessor
    Intel Core i5-10600T left arrow -
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Successor
    - left arrow AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    1.7 GHz left arrow 3.9 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    6 left arrow 8
  • CPU Threads
    12 left arrow 16
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    4.1 GHz left arrow 4.5 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (6 Cores)
    3.5 GHz left arrow -
  • Turbo Frequency (8 Cores)
    - left arrow 4.2 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow -
  • Execution units
    32 left arrow -
  • Generation
    12 left arrow -
  • GPU Frequency
    350 MHz left arrow -
  • GPU name
    Intel UHD Graphics 750 left arrow None
  • GPU Turbo
    1300 MHz left arrow -
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow -
  • Release date
    Q1/2021 left arrow -
  • Shader
    256 left arrow -
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow -
  • Graphics verification source
    - left arrow https://www.amd.com/en/products/specifications/processors.html
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    Decode left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 7 3800X and Intel Core i5-11600T. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow Yes
  • Max. Memory
    128 GB left arrow 128 GB
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR4-3200 left arrow DDR4-3200
  • PCIe lanes
    20 left arrow 20
  • PCIe version
    4.0 left arrow 4.0
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Core i5-11600T and AMD Ryzen 7 3800X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    100 °C left arrow 95 °C
  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    35 W left arrow 105 W
  • TDP (PL2)
    84 W / 28 s left arrow -
  • TDP down
    25 W left arrow -
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Core i5-11600T and AMD Ryzen 7 3800X, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Rocket Lake S left arrow Matisse (Zen 2)
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • L2-Cache
    3.00 MB left arrow -
  • L3-Cache
    12.00 MB left arrow 32.00 MB
  • Release date
    Q1/2021 left arrow Q3/2019
  • Socket
    LGA 1200 left arrow AM4
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V, SVM

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Latest comparisons