Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200s
Intel Core2 Duo E7400
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200s vs Intel Core2 Duo E7400. Specifications

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2009
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200s
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200s
Released
Q4/2008
User rating
star star star star star
Intel Core2 Duo E7400
Intel Core2 Duo E7400

What's the best choice Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200s or Intel Core2 Duo E7400? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200s has a base frequency of 2.33 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in Q1/2009.

Intel Core2 Duo E7400 has a base frequency of 2.80 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in Q4/2008.

Differences

  • More number of cores

    2 more cores

    4 left arrow 2

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200s CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 20% better clock speed

    2.80 GHz left arrow 2.33 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core2 Duo E7400 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1025 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1150 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1151 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200s Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200s
Intel Core2 Duo E7400 Intel Core2 Duo E7400
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Core 2 Quad Q8000/Q9000 left arrow Intel Core 2 Duo E7000/E8000
  • Family
    Intel Core2 Duo left arrow Intel Core2 Duo
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 2
  • Predecessor
    No left arrow No
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop
  • Successor
    No left arrow No
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    2.33 GHz left arrow 2.8 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 2
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 2
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core2 Duo E7400 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200s. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Max. Memory
    16 GB left arrow 16 GB
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR2-800 / DDR3-1066 left arrow DDR2-1066 / DDR3-1333
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Intel Core2 Duo E7400 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    80 °C left arrow 80 °C
  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    65 W left arrow 65 W
  • TDP (PL2)
    No left arrow No
  • TDP down
    No left arrow No
  • TDP up
    No left arrow No
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Intel Core2 Duo E7400, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Yorkfield left arrow Wolfdale
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    MMX, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1 left arrow MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE 4.1
  • L2-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow 3.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    No left arrow No
  • Release date
    Q1/2009 left arrow Q4/2008
  • Socket
    LGA 775 left arrow LGA 775
  • Technology
    45 nm left arrow 45 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d left arrow VT-x

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Latest comparisons