What's the best choice Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 or Intel Core2 Duo E8300? Which processor is faster?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 has a base frequency of 3.20 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 136 W. Released in Q1/2008.
Intel Core2 Duo E8300 has a base frequency of 2.83 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in Q1/2008.
Reasons to consider Higher clock speed
Around 13% better clock speed
More number of cores
2 more cores
Common positions Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Common positions Intel Core2 Duo E8300 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
No data
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core2 Duo E8300 and Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Intel Core2 Duo E8300 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Intel Core2 Duo E8300, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark