Intel Core2 Duo E7600
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400s
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Core2 Duo E7600 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400s. Specifications

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2009
Intel Core2 Duo E7600
Intel Core2 Duo E7600
Released
Q1/2009
User rating
star star star star star
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400s
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400s

What's the best choice Intel Core2 Duo E7600 or Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400s? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

Intel Core2 Duo E7600 has a base frequency of 3.06 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in Q2/2009.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400s has a base frequency of 2.66 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in Q1/2009.

Differences

  • Higher clock speed

    Around 15% better clock speed

    3.06 GHz left arrow 2.66 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core2 Duo E7600 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1006 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1116 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1140 place
  • More number of cores

    2 more cores

    4 left arrow 2

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400s CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Core2 Duo E7600 Intel Core2 Duo E7600
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400s Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400s
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Core 2 Duo E7000/E8000 left arrow Intel Core 2 Quad Q8000/Q9000
  • Family
    Intel Core2 Duo left arrow Intel Core2 Duo
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 2
  • Predecessor
    No left arrow No
  • Segment
    Desktop left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Successor
    No left arrow No
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    3.06 GHz left arrow 2.66 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 4
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400s and Intel Core2 Duo E7600. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Max. Memory
    16 GB left arrow 16 GB
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR2-1066 / DDR3-1333 left arrow DDR2-800 / DDR3-1066
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Core2 Duo E7600 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400s Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    80 °C left arrow 80 °C
  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    65 W left arrow 65 W
  • TDP (PL2)
    No left arrow No
  • TDP down
    No left arrow No
  • TDP up
    No left arrow No
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Core2 Duo E7600 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400s, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Wolfdale left arrow Yorkfield
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE 4.1 left arrow MMX, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1
  • L2-Cache
    3.00 MB left arrow 6.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    No left arrow No
  • Release date
    Q2/2009 left arrow Q1/2009
  • Socket
    LGA 775 left arrow LGA 775
  • Technology
    45 nm left arrow 45 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x left arrow VT-x, VT-d

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Latest comparisons