Intel Celeron J4105
Samsung Exynos 5422
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron J4105 vs Samsung Exynos 5422. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2017
Intel Celeron J4105
Intel Celeron J4105
Released
Q1/2014
User rating
star star star star star
Samsung Exynos 5422
Samsung Exynos 5422

What's the best choice Intel Celeron J4105 or Samsung Exynos 5422? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Celeron J4105 has a base frequency of 1.50 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 10 W. Released in Q4/2017.

Samsung Exynos 5422 has a base frequency of 1.40 GHz. 8 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Released in Q1/2014.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    281 left arrow place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 7% better clock speed

    1.50 GHz left arrow 1.40 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 19% higher specified turbo frequency

    2.50 GHz left arrow 2.10 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron J4105 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    337 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    315 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    502 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    428 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    904 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    772 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1038 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    929 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1404 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    648 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    519 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    314 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    937 place
  • More number of cores

    4 more cores

    8 left arrow 4

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Samsung Exynos 5422 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1504 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Celeron J4105 Intel Celeron J4105
Samsung Exynos 5422 Samsung Exynos 5422
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000 left arrow Samsung Exynos 5260/5410/5420/5422/5800
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow Samsung Exynos
  • Generation
    9 left arrow 3
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • A-Core
    - left arrow 4x Cortex-A15
  • B-Core
    - left arrow 4x Cortex-A7
  • Base Frequency
    1.5 GHz left arrow 1.4 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 8
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    2.5 GHz left arrow 2.1 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
    2.4 GHz left arrow -
  • Turbo Frequency (8 Cores)
    - left arrow 2.1 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow 11
  • Execution units
    12 left arrow 6
  • Generation
    9.5 left arrow Midgard 2
  • GPU Frequency
    250 MHz left arrow 530 MHz
  • GPU name
    Intel UHD Graphics 600 left arrow ARM Mali-T628 MP6
  • GPU Turbo
    750 MHz left arrow No turbo
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 1
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow -
  • Release date
    Q4/2017 left arrow Q4/2012
  • Shader
    96 left arrow 96
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 32nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Conflicting source values: Decode / Encode | No
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Samsung Exynos 5422 and Intel Celeron J4105. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Max. Memory
    8 GB left arrow -
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 0
  • Memory type
    DDR4-2400 left arrow LPDDR3e-933
  • PCIe lanes
    6 left arrow -
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow -
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Celeron J4105 and Samsung Exynos 5422 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    10 W left arrow -
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron J4105 and Samsung Exynos 5422, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Gemini Lake left arrow Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv7-A32 (32 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow -
  • L2-Cache
    - left arrow 2.5 MB
  • L3-Cache
    4 MB left arrow -
  • Release date
    Q4/2017 left arrow Q1/2014
  • Socket
    BGA 1090 left arrow -
  • Technology
    10 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow None

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Celeron J4105 and Samsung Exynos 5422.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games

Higher values are better in this metric.

144.000000
Intel Celeron J4105
102.000000
Samsung Exynos 5422

Latest comparisons