Intel Celeron 847
AMD E1-6010
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron 847 vs AMD E1-6010. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2011
Intel Celeron 847
Intel Celeron 847
Released
Q2/2014
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD E1-6010
AMD E1-6010

What's the best choice Intel Celeron 847 or AMD E1-6010? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Celeron 847 has a maximum frequency of 1.10 GHz. 2 Cores. Power consumption of 17 W. Released in Q2/2011.

AMD E1-6010 has a maximum frequency of 1.35 GHz. 2 Cores. Power consumption of 10 W. Released in Q2/2014.

Differences

Intel Celeron 847 Reasons to consider
Intel Celeron 847
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1726 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron 847 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1047 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1427 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1538 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1632 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    860 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    885 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    733 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    804 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1347 place
AMD E1-6010 Reasons to consider
AMD E1-6010
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1723 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 19% better clock speed

    1.35 GHz left arrow 1.10 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.59 times less performance per watt

    10 W left arrow 17 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD E1-6010 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1067 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1055 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1465 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1544 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1601 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    890 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    901 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    659 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    805 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1360 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Celeron 847 Intel Celeron 847
AMD E1-6010 AMD E1-6010
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow AMD E
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 4
  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron 800 left arrow AMD E1/E2-6000
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    1.10 GHz left arrow 1.35 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (2 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1) left arrow AMD Radeon R2 (Beema)
  • GPU frequency
    0.35 GHz left arrow 0.35 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.80 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    6 left arrow 2
  • Shader
    48 left arrow 128
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 2 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 6
  • DirectX Version
    10.1 left arrow 12
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Release date
    Q2/2011 left arrow Q1/2015
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD E1-6010 and Intel Celeron 847. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 1
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow
  • PCIe lanes
    16 left arrow
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Celeron 847 and AMD E1-6010 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    17 W left arrow 10 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron 847 and Intel Celeron 847, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
  • L3-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow 1.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Sandy Bridge U left arrow Beema (Puma)
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1023 left arrow AM1
  • Release date
    Q2/2011 left arrow Q2/2014

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Celeron 847 and AMD E1-6010.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
68
Intel Celeron 847
45
AMD E1-6010
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
189
Intel Celeron 847
143
AMD E1-6010
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
329
Intel Celeron 847
261
AMD E1-6010
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
77
Intel Celeron 847
90
AMD E1-6010
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
867
Intel Celeron 847
698
AMD E1-6010
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
1436
Intel Celeron 847
1134
AMD E1-6010
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
0.4
Intel Celeron 847
0.31
AMD E1-6010
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
0.6
Intel Celeron 847
0.61
AMD E1-6010
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
968
Intel Celeron 847
885
AMD E1-6010

Latest comparisons