AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475. Specifications

User rating
star star star star star
Released
2025-02-18
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

Family illustration.

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Released
2026-01-05
User rating
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475

Family illustration.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475

What's the best choice AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 or AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 has a base frequency of 2 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 28 W. Released in 2025-02-18.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has a base frequency of 2 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 28 W. Released in 2026-01-05.

Differences


Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data
  • More number of cores

    4 more cores

    12 left arrow 8
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 4 % higher specified turbo frequency

    5.2 GHz left arrow 5 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Family
    Ryzen left arrow Ryzen
  • Form Factor
    Laptops / Desktops left arrow Laptops / Desktops
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Series
    Ryzen AI 300 Series left arrow Ryzen AI 400 Series
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    2 GHz left arrow 2 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 12
  • CPU Threads
    16 left arrow 24
  • Max. Boost Clock
    5 GHz left arrow 5.2 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU Frequency
    3000 MHz left arrow 3100 MHz
  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon 860M left arrow AMD Radeon 890M
  • Graphics Cores
    8 left arrow 16
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR5 (FP8) / LPDDR5X (FP8) left arrow DDR5 (FP8) / LPDDR5X (FP8)
  • PCIe
    PCIe 4.0 left arrow PCIe 4.0
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Configurable TDP
    15-54 W left arrow 15-54 W
  • Default TDP
    28 W left arrow 28 W
  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    100 °C left arrow 100 °C
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Codename
    Krackan Point left arrow Gorgon Point
  • L2-Cache
    8 MB left arrow 12 MB
  • L3-Cache
    16 MB left arrow 24 MB
  • Official source
    https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/laptop/ryzen/ai-300-series/amd-ryzen-ai-7-350.html left arrow https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/laptop/ryzen/ai-400-series/amd-ryzen-ai-9-hx-475.html
  • Release date
    2025-02-18 left arrow 2026-01-05
  • Socket
    FP8 left arrow FP8
  • Technology
    TSMC 4nm FinFET left arrow TSMC 4nm FinFET
  • Verified on
    2026-09-30 left arrow 2026-09-30

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Latest comparisons