AMD Ryzen 7 3700C
AMD Epyc 7301
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Ryzen 7 3700C vs AMD Epyc 7301. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2020
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C
Released
Q3/2017
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD Epyc 7301
AMD Epyc 7301

What's the best choice AMD Ryzen 7 3700C or AMD Epyc 7301? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

AMD Ryzen 7 3700C has a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 15 W. Released in Q3/2020.

AMD Epyc 7301 has a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz. 16 Cores. Power consumption of 170 W. Released in Q3/2017.

Differences

AMD Ryzen 7 3700C Reasons to consider
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    419 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 4% better clock speed

    2.30 GHz left arrow 2.20 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 33% better overclocked clock speed

    4.00 GHz left arrow 2.70 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    15 W left arrow 170 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 7 3700C CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    224 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    232 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    420 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    148 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    212 place
AMD Epyc 7301 Reasons to consider
AMD Epyc 7301
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    593 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    About 4 times more cores

    16 left arrow 4

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Epyc 7301 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    724 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    138 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    280 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    415 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    92 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    474 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    80 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    369 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C AMD Ryzen 7 3700C
AMD Epyc 7301 AMD Epyc 7301
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD Ryzen left arrow AMD Epyc
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 1
  • CPU group
    AMD Ryzen 3000C left arrow AMD Epyc 7001
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    2.30 GHz left arrow 2.20 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 16
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.00 GHz left arrow 2.70 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 32
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon Vega 10 Graphics left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    1.40 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    10 left arrow
  • Shader
    640 left arrow
  • Max. GPU Memory
    2 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow
  • Generation
    8 left arrow
  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow
  • Release date
    Q1/2018 left arrow
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Epyc 7301 and AMD Ryzen 7 3700C. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2666 left arrow DDR4-2666
  • Max. Memory
    64 GB left arrow
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 8
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    20 left arrow 128
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Ryzen 7 3700C and AMD Epyc 7301 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    15 W left arrow 170 W
  • TDP up
    25 W left arrow --
  • TDP down
    12 W left arrow --
  • Tjunction max.
    105 °C left arrow --
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Ryzen 7 3700C and AMD Ryzen 7 3700C, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V, SVM left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • L2-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow --
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow 64.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Picasso (Zen+) left arrow Naples (Zen)
  • Technology
    12 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    FP5 left arrow SP3
  • Release date
    Q3/2020 left arrow Q3/2017

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD Ryzen 7 3700C and AMD Epyc 7301.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Latest comparisons