AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs Intel Xeon Gold 6246R. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2018
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Released
Q1/2020
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R

What's the best choice AMD Ryzen 3 2200G or Intel Xeon Gold 6246R? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G has a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 65 W. Released in Q1/2018.

Intel Xeon Gold 6246R has a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz. 16 Cores. Power consumption of 205 W. Released in Q1/2020.

Differences

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Reasons to consider
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    734 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 3% better clock speed

    3.50 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    65 W left arrow 205 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 3 2200G CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    321 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    294 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    451 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    367 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    502 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    532 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    694 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    828 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    292 place
  • Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
    35 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    207 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    359 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    95 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    305 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    674 place
  • More number of cores

    About 4 times more cores

    16 left arrow 4
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 10 % better overclocked clock speed

    4.10 GHz left arrow 3.70 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon Gold 6246R CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R Intel Xeon Gold 6246R
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD Ryzen left arrow Intel Xeon Gold
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    AMD Ryzen 2000G left arrow Intel Xeon Gold 5200/6200
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    3.50 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 16
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    3.70 GHz left arrow 4.10 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 32
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    1.10 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    8 left arrow
  • Shader
    512 left arrow
  • Max. GPU Memory
    2 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow
  • Generation
    8 left arrow
  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow
  • Release date
    Q1/2018 left arrow
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Xeon Gold 6246R and AMD Ryzen 3 2200G. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2933 left arrow DDR4-2933
  • Max. Memory
    64 GB left arrow 1024 GB
  • ECC
    No left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 6
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    12 left arrow 48
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and Intel Xeon Gold 6246R to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    65 W left arrow 205 W
  • TDP down
    46 W left arrow --
  • Tjunction max.
    95 °C left arrow 76 °C
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and AMD Ryzen 3 2200G, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V, SVM left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow 35.75 MB
  • Architecture
    Raven Ridge (Zen) left arrow Cascade Lake
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    AM4 left arrow LGA 3647
  • Release date
    Q1/2018 left arrow Q1/2020

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and Intel Xeon Gold 6246R.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Latest comparisons