AMD Phenom II X4 965
AMD A10-5800K
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Phenom II X4 965 vs AMD A10-5800K. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2009
AMD Phenom II X4 965
AMD Phenom II X4 965
Released
Q3/2012
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD A10-5800K
AMD A10-5800K

What's the best choice AMD Phenom II X4 965 or AMD A10-5800K? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

AMD Phenom II X4 965 has a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 140 W. Released in Q3/2009.

AMD A10-5800K has a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 100 W. Released in Q3/2012.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1230 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Phenom II X4 965 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    537 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    442 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    851 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    668 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1197 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1101 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    674 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    505 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    521 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    422 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    936 place
AMD A10-5800K Reasons to consider
AMD A10-5800K
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1146 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 11% better clock speed

    3.80 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.71 times less performance per watt

    100 W left arrow 140 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD A10-5800K CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    844 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    712 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1106 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1103 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    554 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    616 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    567 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    357 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    441 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    21 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    878 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Phenom II X4 965 AMD Phenom II X4 965
AMD A10-5800K AMD A10-5800K
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD Phenom II left arrow AMD A
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    AMD Phenom II - 800/900 left arrow AMD A10-5000
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    3.40 GHz left arrow 3.80 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow 4.20 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (4 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow 4.20 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow AMD Radeon HD 7660D
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.80 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    left arrow 6
  • Shader
    left arrow 384
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 2 GB
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 2
  • Generation
    left arrow 4
  • DirectX Version
    left arrow 11
  • Technology
    left arrow 32 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q3/2012
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD A10-5800K and AMD Phenom II X4 965. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR2-1066 left arrow DDR3-1866
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Phenom II X4 965 and AMD A10-5800K to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    140 W left arrow 100 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Phenom II X4 965 and AMD Phenom II X4 965, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE3, SSE4a left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
  • L3-Cache
    6.00 MB left arrow 4.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Deneb (K10) left arrow Trinity (Piledriver)
  • Technology
    45 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Socket
    AM3 left arrow FM2
  • Release date
    Q3/2009 left arrow Q3/2012

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD Phenom II X4 965 and AMD A10-5800K.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
89
AMD Phenom II X4 965
91
AMD A10-5800K
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
344
AMD Phenom II X4 965
314
AMD A10-5800K
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
441
AMD Phenom II X4 965
523
AMD A10-5800K
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
1486
AMD Phenom II X4 965
1483
AMD A10-5800K
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
1816
AMD Phenom II X4 965
2029
AMD A10-5800K
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
6358
AMD Phenom II X4 965
5582
AMD A10-5800K
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
1.03
AMD Phenom II X4 965
1.08
AMD A10-5800K
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
4.06
AMD Phenom II X4 965
3.32
AMD A10-5800K
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
4236
AMD Phenom II X4 965
4683
AMD A10-5800K

Latest comparisons