AMD Epyc 7601
AMD FX-7500
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Epyc 7601 vs AMD FX-7500. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2017
AMD Epyc 7601
AMD Epyc 7601
Released
Q2/2014
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD FX-7500
AMD FX-7500

What's the best choice AMD Epyc 7601 or AMD FX-7500? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

AMD Epyc 7601 has a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz. 32 Cores. Power consumption of 180 W. Released in Q3/2017.

AMD FX-7500 has a maximum frequency of 2.10 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 19 W. Released in Q2/2014.

Differences

AMD Epyc 7601 Reasons to consider
AMD Epyc 7601
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    295 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 5% better clock speed

    2.20 GHz left arrow 2.10 GHz
  • More number of cores

    28 times more cores

    32 left arrow 4

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Epyc 7601 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    454 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    48 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    514 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    21 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    402 place
  • Monero Hashrate kH/s
    8 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    241 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    13 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    455 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    9 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    96 place
AMD FX-7500 Reasons to consider
AMD FX-7500
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1712 left arrow score
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 3 % better overclocked clock speed

    3.30 GHz left arrow 3.20 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.11 times less performance per watt

    19 W left arrow 180 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD FX-7500 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1321 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1358 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    786 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1004 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Epyc 7601 AMD Epyc 7601
AMD FX-7500 AMD FX-7500
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD Epyc left arrow AMD FX
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 3
  • CPU group
    AMD Epyc 7001 left arrow AMD FX-7000
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    2.20 GHz left arrow 2.10 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    32 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    3.20 GHz left arrow 3.30 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    64 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Kaveri)
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.55 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    left arrow 8
  • Shader
    left arrow 512
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 2 GB
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 2
  • Generation
    left arrow 6
  • DirectX Version
    left arrow 12
  • Technology
    left arrow 28 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q1/2014
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD FX-7500 and AMD Epyc 7601. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2666 left arrow DDR3-1600
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    8 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow
  • PCIe lanes
    128 left arrow
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Epyc 7601 and AMD FX-7500 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    180 W left arrow 19 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Epyc 7601 and AMD Epyc 7601, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V, SVM left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
  • L3-Cache
    64.00 MB left arrow 4.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Naples (Zen) left arrow Kaveri (Steamroller)
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Socket
    SP3 left arrow FM2+
  • Release date
    Q3/2017 left arrow Q2/2014

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD Epyc 7601 and AMD FX-7500.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
33500
AMD Epyc 7601
3616
AMD FX-7500

Latest comparisons