AMD E-240
AMD E-300
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD E-240 vs AMD E-300. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2011
AMD E-240
AMD E-240
Released
Q3/2011
User rating
star star star star star
AMD E-300
AMD E-300

What's the best choice AMD E-240 or AMD E-300? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

AMD E-240 has a base frequency of 1.50 GHz. 1 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 18 W. Released in Q1/2011.

AMD E-300 has a base frequency of 1.30 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 18 W. Released in Q3/2011.

Differences

AMD E-240 Reasons to consider
AMD E-240
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 15% better clock speed

    1.50 GHz left arrow 1.30 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD E-240 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1559 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    908 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    922 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    827 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1218 place
AMD E-300 Reasons to consider
AMD E-300
Report a bug
  • More number of cores

    1 more cores

    2 left arrow 1

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD E-300 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1290 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1284 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1559 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    912 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    910 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    807 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    816 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1202 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD E-240 AMD E-240
AMD E-300 AMD E-300
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    AMD E/E1/E2-1000 left arrow AMD E/E1/E2-1000
  • Family
    AMD E left arrow AMD E
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 1
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    1.5 GHz left arrow 1.3 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    1 left arrow 2
  • CPU Threads
    1 left arrow 2
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
    - left arrow No turbo
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 11
  • Execution units
    1 left arrow 1
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 3
  • GPU Frequency
    490 MHz left arrow 490 MHz
  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon HD 6310 left arrow AMD Radeon HD 6310
  • GPU Turbo
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 2
  • Max. GPU Memory
    1 GB left arrow 1 GB
  • Release date
    Q4/2010 left arrow Q4/2010
  • Shader
    80 left arrow 80
  • Technology
    40 nm left arrow 40 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD E-300 and AMD E-240. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    1 left arrow 1
  • Memory type
    DDR3-1066 left arrow DDR3-1066
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD E-240 and AMD E-300 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    18 W left arrow 18 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD E-240 and AMD E-300, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Zacate (Bobcat) left arrow Zacate (Bobcat)
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
  • L3-Cache
    1 MB left arrow 1 MB
  • Release date
    Q1/2011 left arrow Q3/2011
  • Socket
    BGA 413 left arrow BGA 413
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow AMD-V

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD E-240 and AMD E-300.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games

Higher values are better in this metric.

79.000000
AMD E-240
79.000000
AMD E-300
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

532.000000
AMD E-240
489.000000
AMD E-300
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

529.000000
AMD E-240
877.000000
AMD E-300
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

0.260000
AMD E-240
0.480000
AMD E-300
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks

Higher values are better in this metric.

371.000000
AMD E-240
627.000000
AMD E-300

Latest comparisons