AMD A6-6400K
AMD FX-8300
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD A6-6400K vs AMD FX-8300. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2013
AMD A6-6400K
AMD A6-6400K
Released
Q2/2013
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD FX-8300
AMD FX-8300

What's the best choice AMD A6-6400K or AMD FX-8300? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

AMD A6-6400K has a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz. 2 Cores. Power consumption of 65 W. Released in Q2/2013.

AMD FX-8300 has a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. 8 Cores. Power consumption of 95 W. Released in Q2/2013.

Differences

AMD A6-6400K Reasons to consider
AMD A6-6400K
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1502 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 15% better clock speed

    3.90 GHz left arrow 3.30 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    65 W left arrow 95 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD A6-6400K CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    522 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1174 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1426 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1144 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    610 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    753 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    697 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    750 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1157 place
AMD FX-8300 Reasons to consider
AMD FX-8300
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1056 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    About 4 times more cores

    8 left arrow 2
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 2 % better overclocked clock speed

    4.20 GHz left arrow 4.10 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD FX-8300 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    551 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    393 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    815 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    466 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1117 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    907 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    590 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    367 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    360 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    292 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    611 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD A6-6400K AMD A6-6400K
AMD FX-8300 AMD FX-8300
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD A left arrow AMD FX
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    AMD A6-6000 left arrow AMD FX-8000
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    3.90 GHz left arrow 3.30 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.10 GHz left arrow 4.20 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon HD 8470D left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    0.80 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    3 left arrow
  • Shader
    192 left arrow
  • Max. GPU Memory
    2 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow
  • Generation
    5 left arrow
  • DirectX Version
    11.2 left arrow
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow
  • Release date
    Q2/2013 left arrow
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD FX-8300 and AMD A6-6400K. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1866 left arrow DDR3-1866
  • ECC
    No left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD A6-6400K and AMD FX-8300 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    65 W left arrow 95 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD A6-6400K and AMD A6-6400K, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
  • L3-Cache
    1.00 MB left arrow 8.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Richland (Piledriver) left arrow Vishera (Bulldozer)
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Socket
    FM2 left arrow AM3+
  • Release date
    Q2/2013 left arrow Q2/2013

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD A6-6400K and AMD FX-8300.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 MC is a high load CPU test for long tasks on a desktop or notebook PC, using a multi-core and hyperthreading
252
AMD A6-6400K
1088
AMD FX-8300
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
471
AMD A6-6400K
517
AMD FX-8300
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
723
AMD A6-6400K
2311
AMD FX-8300
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
2063
AMD A6-6400K
2144
AMD FX-8300
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
3292
AMD A6-6400K
10892
AMD FX-8300
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
0.83
AMD A6-6400K
1.11
AMD FX-8300
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
1.66
AMD A6-6400K
6.77
AMD FX-8300
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
2397
AMD A6-6400K
8844
AMD FX-8300

Latest comparisons