AMD A10-6700T vs AMD FX-9590 - differences in specs

Differences
Specifications Benchmarks Testimonials

Differences

Reasons to consider
AMD A10-6700T

Report a bug

Place in the overall ranking

(based on several benchmarks)

1284 score
Performance per watt

times less performance per watt

45 W 220 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD A10-6700T CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

1007 place
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

899 place
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

597 place
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

705 place
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

622 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

630 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

559 place
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

981 place

Reasons to consider
AMD FX-9590

Report a bug

Place in the overall ranking

(based on several benchmarks)

931 score
Higher clock speed

Around 47% better clock speed

4.70 GHz 2.50 GHz
More number of cores

About 2 times more cores

8 4
Higher turbo clock speed

Around 30 % better overclocked clock speed

5.00 GHz 3.50 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD FX-9590 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

755 place
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

414 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

997 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

767 place
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

51 place
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

526 place
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

289 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

510 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

233 place
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

518 place

Specifications

Technical data

AMD A10-6700T

AMD FX-9590

CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

Segment

Desktop / Server Desktop / Server
Family

AMD A AMD FX
Generation

3 2
CPU group

AMD A10-6000 AMD FX-9000

CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

Frequency

2.50 GHz 4.70 GHz
CPU Cores

4 8
Turbo (1 Core)

3.50 GHz 5.00 GHz
CPU Threads

4 8
Hyperthreading

No No
Overclocking

No Yes
Core architecture

normal normal

IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

GPU name

AMD Radeon HD 8650D no iGPU
GPU frequency

0.72 GHz
GPU (Turbo)

No turbo No turbo
Execution units

6
Shader

384
Max. GPU Memory

2 GB --
Max. displays

2
Generation

5
DirectX Version

11.2
Technology

32 nm
Release date

Q2/2013

Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

h265 / HEVC (8 bit)

No No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)

No No
h264

Decode No
VP9

No No
VP8

No No
AV1

No No
AVC

Decode No
VC-1

Decode No
JPEG

Decode / Encode No

Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD FX-9590 and AMD A10-6700T. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

Memory type

DDR3-1866 DDR3-1866
ECC

No Yes
Memory channels

2 2

Encryption

AES-NI

Yes Yes

Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD A10-6700T and AMD FX-9590 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

TDP (PL1)

45 W 220 W

Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD A10-6700T and AMD A10-6700T, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

Instruction set (ISA)

x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
Virtualization

AMD-V AMD-V
ISA extensions

SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
L3-Cache

4.00 MB 8.00 MB
Architecture

Richland (Piledriver) Vishera (Piledriver)
Technology

32 nm 32 nm
Socket

FM2 AM3+
Release date

Q3/2013 Q3/2013

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD A10-6700T and AMD FX-9590.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

AMD A10-6700T

114

AMD FX-9590

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

201

AMD A10-6700T

713

AMD FX-9590

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

1706

AMD A10-6700T

2587

AMD FX-9590

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

5003

AMD A10-6700T

13110

AMD FX-9590

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D

0.89

AMD A10-6700T

1.37

AMD FX-9590

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D

2.73

AMD A10-6700T

8.52

AMD FX-9590

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks

3853

AMD A10-6700T

10465

AMD FX-9590