AMD A10-6700T
AMD Athlon II X4 860K
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD A10-6700T vs AMD Athlon II X4 860K. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2013
AMD A10-6700T
AMD A10-6700T
Released
Q4/2014
User rating
star star star star star
AMD Athlon II X4 860K
AMD Athlon II X4 860K

What's the best choice AMD A10-6700T or AMD Athlon II X4 860K? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

AMD A10-6700T has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. Released in Q3/2013.

AMD Athlon II X4 860K has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 95 W. Released in Q4/2014.

Differences

AMD A10-6700T Reasons to consider
AMD A10-6700T
Report a bug
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    45 W left arrow 95 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD A10-6700T CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    978 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    882 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    551 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    705 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    616 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    641 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    583 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    801 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    270 left arrow place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 48% better clock speed

    3.70 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 14 % higher specified turbo frequency

    4.00 GHz left arrow 3.50 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Athlon II X4 860K CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    329 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    308 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    416 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    792 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    723 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    913 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    845 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    539 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    428 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    561 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    437 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    622 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD A10-6700T AMD A10-6700T
AMD Athlon II X4 860K AMD Athlon II X4 860K
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    AMD A10-6000 left arrow AMD Athlon II (Kaveri)
  • Family
    AMD A left arrow AMD Athlon II
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 1
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    2.5 GHz left arrow 3.7 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 4
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    3.5 GHz left arrow 4 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
    3.5 GHz left arrow 4 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    11.2 left arrow -
  • Execution units
    6 left arrow -
  • Generation
    5 left arrow -
  • GPU Frequency
    720 MHz left arrow -
  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon HD 8650D left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU Turbo
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow -
  • Max. GPU Memory
    2 GB left arrow -
  • Release date
    Q2/2013 left arrow -
  • Shader
    384 left arrow -
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow -
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    Decode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Athlon II X4 860K and AMD A10-6700T. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR3-1866 left arrow DDR3-1866
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD A10-6700T and AMD Athlon II X4 860K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    45 W left arrow 95 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD A10-6700T and AMD Athlon II X4 860K, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Richland (Piledriver) left arrow Kaveri
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 left arrow SSE3
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow 4.00 MB
  • Release date
    Q3/2013 left arrow Q4/2014
  • Socket
    FM2 left arrow FM2+
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow None

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD A10-6700T and AMD Athlon II X4 860K.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

Higher values are better in this metric.

50.000000
AMD A10-6700T
94.000000
AMD Athlon II X4 860K
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

Higher values are better in this metric.

201.000000
AMD A10-6700T
295.000000
AMD Athlon II X4 860K
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

1706.000000
AMD A10-6700T
2500.000000
AMD Athlon II X4 860K
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

5003.000000
AMD A10-6700T
8155.000000
AMD Athlon II X4 860K
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

0.890000
AMD A10-6700T
1.030000
AMD Athlon II X4 860K
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

2.730000
AMD A10-6700T
3.970000
AMD Athlon II X4 860K
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks

Higher values are better in this metric.

3853.000000
AMD A10-6700T
5636.000000
AMD Athlon II X4 860K

Latest comparisons