AMD A10-5700 vs AMD FX-9370 - differences in specs

Differences
Specifications Benchmarks Testimonials

Differences

Reasons to consider
AMD A10-5700

Report a bug

Place in the overall ranking

(based on several benchmarks)

1236 score
Performance per watt

times less performance per watt

65 W 220 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD A10-5700 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

996 place
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

848 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

1169 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

1209 place
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

558 place
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

654 place
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

606 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

427 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

479 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

24 place
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

935 place

Reasons to consider
AMD FX-9370

Report a bug

Place in the overall ranking

(based on several benchmarks)

902 score
Higher clock speed

Around 23% better clock speed

4.40 GHz 3.40 GHz
More number of cores

About 2 times more cores

8 4
Higher turbo clock speed

Around 15 % better overclocked clock speed

4.70 GHz 4.00 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD FX-9370 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

427 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

1021 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

762 place
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

23 place
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

556 place
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

309 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

503 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

205 place
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

561 place

Specifications

Technical data

AMD A10-5700

AMD FX-9370

CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

Segment

Desktop / Server Desktop / Server
Family

AMD A AMD FX
Generation

2 2
CPU group

AMD A10-5000 AMD FX-9000

CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

Frequency

3.40 GHz 4.40 GHz
CPU Cores

4 8
Turbo (1 Core)

4.00 GHz 4.70 GHz
CPU Threads

4 8
Hyperthreading

No No
Overclocking

No Yes
Core architecture

normal normal

IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

GPU name

AMD Radeon HD 7660D no iGPU
GPU frequency

0.80 GHz
GPU (Turbo)

No turbo No turbo
Execution units

6
Shader

384
Max. GPU Memory

2 GB --
Max. displays

2
Generation

4
DirectX Version

11
Technology

32 nm
Release date

Q3/2012

Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

h265 / HEVC (8 bit)

No No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)

No No
h264

Decode No
VP9

No No
VP8

No No
AV1

No No
AVC

Decode No
VC-1

Decode No
JPEG

Decode / Encode No

Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD FX-9370 and AMD A10-5700. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

Memory type

DDR3-1866 DDR3-1866
ECC

No Yes
Memory channels

2 2

Encryption

AES-NI

Yes Yes

Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD A10-5700 and AMD FX-9370 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

TDP (PL1)

65 W 220 W

Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD A10-5700 and AMD A10-5700, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

Instruction set (ISA)

x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
Virtualization

AMD-V AMD-V
ISA extensions

SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
L3-Cache

4.00 MB 8.00 MB
Architecture

Trinity (Piledriver) Vishera (Piledriver)
Technology

32 nm 32 nm
Socket

FM2 AM3+
Release date

Q3/2012 Q3/2013

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD A10-5700 and AMD FX-9370.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

231

AMD A10-5700

699

AMD FX-9370

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

473

AMD A10-5700

613

AMD FX-9370

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

1263

AMD A10-5700

3040

AMD FX-9370

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

1892

AMD A10-5700

2386

AMD FX-9370

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

5210

AMD A10-5700

12406

AMD FX-9370

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D

1.03

AMD A10-5700

1.35

AMD FX-9370

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D

AMD A10-5700

8.37

AMD FX-9370

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks

4252

AMD A10-5700

9652

AMD FX-9370