Qual é a melhor escolha Intel Core i9-13900HX ou Intel Core i5-13450HX? Qual é o processador mais rápido?
Preparámos uma comparação para o ajudar a escolher o melhor processador. Comparar as suas especificações e padrões de referência.
Intel Core i9-13900HX has a base frequency of 2.00 GHz (5.40 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. Lançado em Q1/2023.
Intel Core i5-13450HX has a base frequency of 1.40 GHz (4.60 GHz). 10 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. Lançado em Q4/2022.
Razões a considerar Mais número de núcleos
14 more cores
Posições comuns Intel Core i9-13900HX CPU em padrões de referência populares, para comparação com outros modelos.
Razões a considerar Posições comuns Intel Core i5-13450HX CPU em padrões de referência populares, para comparação com outros modelos.
Intel Core i9-13900HX
Informação de base sobre os processadores a serem comparados, séries, geração e segmento de mercado.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
A placa gráfica interna não afecta o desempenho da CPU, realiza o trabalho da placa gráfica na sua ausência ou em dispositivos móveis.
Codecs incorporados utilizados para codificar e descodificar o conteúdo. Acelera significativamente as operações necessárias.
Tipos, quantidade de canais de RAM suportados por Intel Core i5-13450HX e Intel Core i9-13900HX. Dependendo das placas-mãe, podem ser suportadas frequências de memória mais altas ou mais baixas.
Comparar os requisitos de TDP do TDP Intel Core i9-13900HX e Intel Core i5-13450HX Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Arquitectura, interfaces, instruções adicionais suportadas por Intel Core i9-13900HX e Intel Core i5-13450HX, tecnologias de máquinas virtuais e tecnologia de processos.
Shared tests with results for both models: 9
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900HX | Intel Core i5-13450HX | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 377.58323 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 201.760211 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -46.6 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 291.153005 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 191.169363 samples/min Submissions: 12 | -34.3 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 434.178371 samples/min Submissions: 32 | 227.473124 samples/min Submissions: 34 | -47.6 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 347.602066 samples/min Submissions: 73 | 180.832808 samples/min Submissions: 77 | -48.0 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 330.685394 samples/min Submissions: 25 | 185.99406 samples/min Submissions: 22 | -43.8 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 294.767578 samples/min Submissions: 62 | 187.499397 samples/min Submissions: 23 | -36.4 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 320.871804 samples/min Submissions: 57 | 180.674568 samples/min Submissions: 39 | -43.7 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 313.229039 samples/min Submissions: 48 | 191.829731 samples/min Submissions: 24 | -38.8 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 361.636386 samples/min Submissions: 88 | 186.461802 samples/min Submissions: 24 | -48.4 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900HX | 1675 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900HX | 121.4 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900HX | 9669.926721 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 10M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 1034.134 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13450HX | 5433.459679 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 10M / 14 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Dell Inc. / 04TT83 Duration: 1840.448 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900HX | 29376 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900HX | 2057 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900HX | 11164 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900HX | 790 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900HX | 4502 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900HX | 299 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
Com base nos resultados de vários parâmetros de referência, é possível estimar com maior precisão a diferença de desempenho entre Intel Core i9-13900HX e Intel Core i5-13450HX.
Compare os valores dos testes sintéticos e escolha o melhor processador!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.