Qual é a melhor escolha Intel Core i9-12900H ou Intel Core i5-13500? Qual é o processador mais rápido?
Preparámos uma comparação para o ajudar a escolher o melhor processador. Comparar as suas especificações e padrões de referência.
Intel Core i9-12900H has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. Lançado em Q1/2022.
Intel Core i5-13500 has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz (5.20 GHz). 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Lançado em Q1/2023.
Razões a considerar Lugar na classificação geral
(com base em vários pontos de referência)
lugar
Maior velocidade do relógio turbo
Por volta de 4% higher specified turbo frequency
4.80 GHz
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
65 W
Posições comuns Intel Core i9-12900H CPU em padrões de referência populares, para comparação com outros modelos.
Razões a considerar Posições comuns Intel Core i5-13500 CPU em padrões de referência populares, para comparação com outros modelos.
Intel Core i9-12900H
Informação de base sobre os processadores a serem comparados, séries, geração e segmento de mercado.
Intel Core i 13000
13th Generation Intel Core i5 Processors
13
Intel Core i5-12500
Desktop
i5-13500
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
6x Raptor Cove
8x Gracemont
-
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
14
20
Sim
Não
-
-
2.50 GHz (5.20 GHz)
2.80 GHz (4.00 GHz)
1.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
8
4.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
4.8 GHz
6
A placa gráfica interna não afecta o desempenho da CPU, realiza o trabalho da placa gráfica na sua ausência ou em dispositivos móveis.
12
32
11
300 MHz
Intel UHD Graphics 770
1550 MHz
3
64 GB
Q4/2021
256
10 nm
300 MHz
eDP 1.4b, DP 1.4a, HDMI 2.1
Codecs incorporados utilizados para codificar e descodificar o conteúdo. Acelera significativamente as operações necessárias.
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Tipos, quantidade de canais de RAM suportados por Intel Core i5-13500 e Intel Core i9-12900H. Dependendo das placas-mãe, podem ser suportadas frequências de memória mais altas ou mais baixas.
Sim
192 GB
2
Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s
5.0 x 20
89.6 GB/s
20
5.0 and 4.0
Sim
Comparar os requisitos de TDP do TDP Intel Core i9-12900H e Intel Core i5-13500 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
65 W
117 W
154 W
65 W
Arquitectura, interfaces, instruções adicionais suportadas por Intel Core i9-12900H e Intel Core i5-13500, tecnologias de máquinas virtuais e tecnologia de processos.
Alder Lake S Refresh
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
Conflicting source values: 11.5 MB (Total cache capacity) | 20 MB
24 MB
Q1/2023
FCLGA1700
Intel 7 (Manufacturer process designation)
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
24 MB Intel Smart Cache
Monolithic
Products formerly Raptor Lake
Launched
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
PC/Client/Tablet, Workstation
Shared tests with results for both models: 6
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-12900H | Intel Core i5-13500 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 159.549039 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 261.585647 samples/min Submissions: 20 | +64.0 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 189.264863 samples/min Submissions: 15 | 255.149947 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +34.8 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 171.04592 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 215.962394 samples/min Submissions: 11 | +26.3 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 189.125975 samples/min Submissions: 23 | 248.528431 samples/min Submissions: 31 | +31.4 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 207.663846 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 265.346667 samples/min Submissions: 20 | +27.8 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 191.400675 samples/min Submissions: 41 | 242.080704 samples/min Submissions: 75 | +26.5 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13500 | 7227.73136 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 17 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / MAG B760 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D96) Duration: 138.356 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900H | 5800.194887 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 17 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / GU603ZW Duration: 172.408 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
Com base nos resultados de vários parâmetros de referência, é possível estimar com maior precisão a diferença de desempenho entre Intel Core i9-12900H e Intel Core i5-13500.
Compare os valores dos testes sintéticos e escolha o melhor processador!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
