AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D vs AMD Ryzen 9 9950X — 사양, 성능, 테스트

차이점
사양 벤치마크 사용 후기

차이점

고려해야 하는 이유
AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D

버그 신고하기

더 빠른 클럭 속도

주변 9% 더 나은 클럭 속도

4.7 GHz 4.3 GHz
Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

120 W 170 W

고려해야 하는 이유
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

버그 신고하기

더 많은 코어 수

8 more cores

16 8
더 빠른 터보 클럭 속도

주변 2 % higher specified turbo frequency

5.7 GHz 5.6 GHz

사양

기술 데이터

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

CPU 제품군 및 그룹

비교 대상 프로세서, 시리즈, 세대 및 시장 부문에 대한 배경 정보.

가족

Ryzen Ryzen
Form Factor

Desktops / Boxed Processor Desktops / Boxed Processor
세그먼트

Desktop Desktop
Series

Ryzen 9000 Series Ryzen 9000 Series

CPU 기술 사양

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

Base Frequency

4.7 GHz 4.3 GHz
CPU 코어

8 16
CPU 스레드

16 32
Max. Boost Clock

5.6 GHz 5.7 GHz
오버클러킹

예 예
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)

5.6 GHz 5.7 GHz

IGPU

내부 그래픽은 CPU의 성능에 영향을 미치지 않으며, 부재 시 또는 모바일 장치에서 그래픽 카드의 작업을 수행합니다.

GPU Frequency

2200 MHz 2200 MHz
GPU 이름

AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Radeon Graphics
Graphics Cores

2 2

메모리 사양 및 PCI

지원되는 RAM의 유형, 채널 수량 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 그리고 AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D. 마더보드에 따라 더 높거나 낮은 메모리 주파수가 지원될 수 있습니다.

메모리 채널

2 2
메모리 유형

DDR5 DDR5
PCIe

PCIe 5.0 PCIe 5.0

열 관리

TDP 요구 사항 비교 AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D 그리고 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Default TDP

120 W 170 W
Maximum Operating Temperature

95 °C 95 °C
TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)

120 W 170 W

기술 및 확장 기능

아키텍처, 인터페이스, 지원되는 추가 지침 AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D 그리고 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X, 가상 머신 기술 및 프로세스 기술.

아키텍처

Zen 5 Zen 5
Codename

Granite Ridge AM5 Granite Ridge AM5
I/O die process

TSMC 6nm FinFET TSMC 6nm FinFET
L2-Cache

8 MB 16 MB
L3-Cache

96 MB 64 MB
릴리스 날짜

2026-01-29 2024-08-15
소켓

AM5 AM5
기술

TSMC 4nm FinFET TSMC 4nm FinFET

벤치마크

성능 테스트 CPUs

Shared tests with results for both models: 8

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settings	AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D	AMD Ryzen 9 9950X	Result difference¹
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux	383.795396 samples/min Submissions: 6	693.426762 samples/min Submissions: 35	+80.7 %
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows	369.333839 samples/min Submissions: 13	660.071659 samples/min Submissions: 74	+78.7 %
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Linux	402.598448 samples/min Submissions: 11	696.735529 samples/min Submissions: 22	+73.1 %
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows	372.970672 samples/min Submissions: 49	675.72808 samples/min Submissions: 112	+81.2 %
Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Linux	409.178196 samples/min Submissions: 8	704.410906 samples/min Submissions: 12	+72.2 %
Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows	381.718049 samples/min Submissions: 6	674.961793 samples/min Submissions: 73	+76.8 %
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows	345.155384 samples/min Submissions: 19	615.176643 samples/min Submissions: 489	+78.2 %
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows	330.003228 samples/min Submissions: 5	584.629139 samples/min Submissions: 383	+77.2 %

¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux 752.33423 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows 594.320039 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux 724.660083 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 587.829801 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux 702.300171 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux 719.160504 samples/min
Blender 5.0.0 / CPU / Windows 589.990691 samples/min

Results with primary test sources

Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.

Model	Test	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X	Cinebench 2024 / multi-core	2254 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X	Cinebench 2024 / single-core	136 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X	Cinebench R15 / multi-core	6335 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X	Cinebench R15 / single-core	344 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X	Cinebench R20 / multi-core	15788 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X	Cinebench R20 / single-core	871 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X	Cinebench R23 / multi-core	40924 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X	Cinebench R23 / single-core	2202 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X	RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads	28415.55 H/s	System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / X870E AORUS MASTER Duration: 35.192 s

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D	14388.075163 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG CROSSHAIR X870E APEX Duration: 69.502 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X	17517.429843 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI Duration: 57.086 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.