ベストな選択とは Intel Core i9-13900K または AMD Ryzen 7 5800? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i9-13900K has a base frequency of 3.80 GHz. 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. で発売されました。 Q4/2022.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800 has a base frequency of 3.40 GHz. 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. で発売されました。 Q2/2021.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
クロックの高速化
周辺 12% クロックスピードの向上
より多くのコア数
16 more cores
共通ポジション Intel Core i9-13900K 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
考慮すべき理由 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Intel Core i9-13900K
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 AMD Ryzen 7 5800 と Intel Core i9-13900K. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
TDPの要求事項を比較する Intel Core i9-13900K と AMD Ryzen 7 5800 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 Intel Core i9-13900K と AMD Ryzen 7 5800, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Shared tests with results for both models: 2
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900K | AMD Ryzen 7 5800 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 487.07809 samples/min Submissions: 173 | 178.834206 samples/min Submissions: 5 | -63.3 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 506.012269 samples/min Submissions: 251 | 201.105007 samples/min Submissions: 24 | -60.3 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6191 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 327 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 15181 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 828 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 40103 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2267 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800 | 7556.1802 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 132.342 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900K | 9028.644277 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B760M-H2/M.2 Duration: 1107.586 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |