ベストな選択とは Intel Core i9-13900H または Intel Core i5-13600K? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i9-13900H has a base frequency of 2.60 GHz (5.40 GHz). 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. で発売されました。 Q1/2023.
Intel Core i5-13600K has a base frequency of 3.40 GHz. 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. で発売されました。 Q4/2022.
考慮すべき理由 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共通ポジション Intel Core i9-13900H 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
考慮すべき理由 共通ポジション Intel Core i5-13600K 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
Intel Core i9-13900H
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 Intel Core i5-13600K と Intel Core i9-13900H. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
TDPの要求事項を比較する Intel Core i9-13900H と Intel Core i5-13600K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 Intel Core i9-13900H と Intel Core i5-13600K, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Shared tests with results for both models: 9
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900H | Intel Core i5-13600K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 203.029651 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 312.8135 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +54.1 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Linux | 230.78364 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 320.668184 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +38.9 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 183.738244 samples/min Submissions: 56 | 302.183788 samples/min Submissions: 31 | +64.5 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 196.311314 samples/min Submissions: 39 | 282.092469 samples/min Submissions: 21 | +43.7 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 206.012944 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 288.051585 samples/min Submissions: 27 | +39.8 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 195.081862 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 356.492646 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +82.7 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 151.490866 samples/min Submissions: 53 | 280.268891 samples/min Submissions: 77 | +85.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 201.364266 samples/min Submissions: 31 | 304.007374 samples/min Submissions: 62 | +51.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 212.627128 samples/min Submissions: 118 | 302.993163 samples/min Submissions: 145 | +42.5 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900H | 5067.113924 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 17 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 197.351 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13600K | 7629.627369 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 20 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / Z690 UD DDR4 Duration: 131.068 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |