ベストな選択とは Intel Core i9-13900F または Intel Core i7-12700KF? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか？
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i9-13900F has a base frequency of 2.00 GHz (5.60 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. で発売されました。 Q1/2023.
Intel Core i7-12700KF has a base frequency of 3.60 GHz. 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. で発売されました。 Q4/2021.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
場所
より多くのコア数
12 more cores
12
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
125 W
共通ポジション Intel Core i9-13900F 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
考慮すべき理由
Intel Core i9-13900F
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Intel Core i 12000
Intel Core i7
12
Intel Core i7-11700KF
Desktop / Server
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
8x Golden Cove
-
4x Gracemont
-
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
12
20
はい
はい
3.6 GHz
5 GHz
4.7 GHz
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
None
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode
Decode / Encode
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 Intel Core i7-12700KF と Intel Core i9-13900F. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
いいえ
256 GB
-
2
DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
-
20
5.0
はい
TDPの要求事項を比較する Intel Core i9-13900F と Intel Core i7-12700KF Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
125 W
228 W / 56 s
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 Intel Core i9-13900F と Intel Core i7-12700KF, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Alder Lake S
-
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
2.5 MB
25 MB
-
BX8071512700K
Q4/2021
LGA 1700
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Shared tests with results for both models: 2
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900F | Intel Core i7-12700KF | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 395.646202 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 273.398609 samples/min Submissions: 43 | -30.9 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 445.083979 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 278.887706 samples/min Submissions: 43 | -37.3 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-12700KF | 7153.689873 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / B760 GAMING X DDR4 Duration: 139.788 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900F | 9449.652253 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.1 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 105.824 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
