ベストな選択とは Intel Core i5-12600KF または Intel Core i7-12700KF? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i5-12600KF has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 10 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. で発売されました。 Q4/2021.
Intel Core i7-12700KF has a base frequency of 3.60 GHz. 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. で発売されました。 Q4/2021.
考慮すべき理由 クロックの高速化
周辺 3% クロックスピードの向上
考慮すべき理由 より多くのコア数
2 more cores
ターボクロックの高速化
周辺 2 % higher specified turbo frequency
Intel Core i5-12600KF
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 Intel Core i7-12700KF と Intel Core i5-12600KF. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
TDPの要求事項を比較する Intel Core i5-12600KF と Intel Core i7-12700KF Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 Intel Core i5-12600KF と Intel Core i7-12700KF, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Shared tests with results for both models: 8
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12600KF | Intel Core i7-12700KF | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 230.73656 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 261.198774 samples/min Submissions: 10 | +13.2 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 273.020219 samples/min Submissions: 56 | 349.422858 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +28.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 212.359267 samples/min Submissions: 18 | 289.770122 samples/min Submissions: 95 | +36.5 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 206.462201 samples/min Submissions: 13 | 274.137726 samples/min Submissions: 32 | +32.8 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 206.745774 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 276.449649 samples/min Submissions: 55 | +33.7 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 208.967218 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 273.398609 samples/min Submissions: 43 | +30.8 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 218.901563 samples/min Submissions: 31 | 289.715603 samples/min Submissions: 24 | +32.3 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 220.177216 samples/min Submissions: 56 | 278.887706 samples/min Submissions: 43 | +26.7 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12600KF | 6346.264906 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 14 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / B760M GAMING AC DDR4 Duration: 157.573 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-12700KF | 7153.689873 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / B760 GAMING X DDR4 Duration: 139.788 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |