ベストな選択とは Intel Core i5-12600K または Intel Core i7-12700F? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i5-12600K has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 10 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. で発売されました。 Q4/2021.
Intel Core i7-12700F has a base frequency of 2.10 GHz. 12 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. で発売されました。 Q1/2022.
考慮すべき理由 クロックの高速化
周辺 76% クロックスピードの向上
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
より多くのコア数
2 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共通ポジション Intel Core i7-12700F 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
Intel Core i5-12600K
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 Intel Core i7-12700F と Intel Core i5-12600K. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
TDPの要求事項を比較する Intel Core i5-12600K と Intel Core i7-12700F Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 Intel Core i5-12600K と Intel Core i7-12700F, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Shared tests with results for both models: 7
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12600K | Intel Core i7-12700F | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 172.027686 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 290.591962 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +68.9 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 215.302947 samples/min Submissions: 35 | 228.87724 samples/min Submissions: 22 | +6.3 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 219.278982 samples/min Submissions: 24 | 249.656014 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +13.9 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 211.269775 samples/min Submissions: 38 | 234.358451 samples/min Submissions: 14 | +10.9 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 208.231011 samples/min Submissions: 37 | 213.615042 samples/min Submissions: 22 | +2.6 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 224.769114 samples/min Submissions: 32 | 274.511737 samples/min Submissions: 10 | +22.1 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 217.066649 samples/min Submissions: 96 | 253.915537 samples/min Submissions: 15 | +17.0 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12600K | 5773.672055 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 10 threads / linux System RAM: 32 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME Z690-P Duration: 173.2 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-12700F | 7964.890762 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B660M-C Duration: 125.551 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |