ベストな選択とは AMD Ryzen 7 3700X または AMD Ryzen 9 7950X? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか?
最適なプロセッサーを選ぶために、比較を用意しました。それぞれの仕様とベンチマークを比較してみてください。
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X has a base frequency of 3.6 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. で発売されました。 2019-07-07.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X has a base frequency of 4.5 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 170 W. で発売されました。 2022-09-27.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共通ポジション AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
クロックの高速化
周辺 25% クロックスピードの向上
より多くのコア数
8 more cores
ターボクロックの高速化
周辺 30 % higher specified turbo frequency
共通ポジション AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X と AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
TDPの要求事項を比較する AMD Ryzen 7 3700X と AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X と AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Shared tests with results for both models: 16
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 191.164264 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 632.530096 samples/min Submissions: 10 | +230.9 % |
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 172.081997 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 555.14446 samples/min Submissions: 15 | +222.6 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 173.786966 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 577.564381 samples/min Submissions: 26 | +232.3 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 181.03671 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 599.189804 samples/min Submissions: 15 | +231.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 187.541548 samples/min Submissions: 23 | 640.195415 samples/min Submissions: 60 | +241.4 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 169.87457 samples/min Submissions: 82 | 539.85203 samples/min Submissions: 186 | +217.8 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 189.39345 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 627.290228 samples/min Submissions: 41 | +231.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 167.274174 samples/min Submissions: 50 | 533.737601 samples/min Submissions: 202 | +219.1 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 193.02372 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 644.599619 samples/min Submissions: 76 | +233.9 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 164.30955 samples/min Submissions: 63 | 521.842157 samples/min Submissions: 504 | +217.6 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 193.296986 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 639.162595 samples/min Submissions: 82 | +230.7 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 164.46996 samples/min Submissions: 92 | 527.799756 samples/min Submissions: 470 | +220.9 % |
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 195.508577 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 672.672632 samples/min Submissions: 36 | +244.1 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 173.575914 samples/min Submissions: 44 | 550.882976 samples/min Submissions: 294 | +217.4 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 196.530057 samples/min Submissions: 26 | 658.852208 samples/min Submissions: 132 | +235.2 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 175.205341 samples/min Submissions: 120 | 546.570676 samples/min Submissions: 593 | +212.0 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6236 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 317 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 14891 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 783 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 38248 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2017 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | 8328.336332 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Duration: 120.072 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | 10417.426271 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI Duration: 95.993 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
複数のベンチマークの結果をもとに、より正確に両者の性能差を見積もることができます。 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X と AMD Ryzen 9 7950X.
合成テストの値を比較して、最適なプロセッサを選ぼう!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.