Quel est le meilleur choix ? Intel Core i9-13900F ou AMD Ryzen 7 5700? Quel est le processeur le plus rapide ?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i9-13900F has a base frequency of 2.00 GHz (5.60 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Sorti en Q1/2023.
AMD Ryzen 7 5700 has a base frequency of 3.7 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Sorti en 2024-01-31.
Raisons de considérer Place dans le classement général
(sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)
Plus grand nombre de cœurs
16 more cores
Positions communes Intel Core i9-13900F CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
Raisons de considérer
Intel Core i9-13900F
Informations générales sur les processeurs comparés, la série, la génération et le segment de marché.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics n'affecte pas les performances du CPU, il effectue le travail de la carte graphique en son absence ou sur les appareils mobiles.
Codecs intégrés utilisés pour coder et décoder le contenu. Accélère considérablement les opérations requises.
Types, canal quantité de RAM supportée par AMD Ryzen 7 5700 et Intel Core i9-13900F. Selon les cartes mères, des fréquences de mémoire supérieures ou inférieures peuvent être prises en charge.
Comparez les exigences du TDP Intel Core i9-13900F et AMD Ryzen 7 5700 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, instructions supplémentaires supportées par Intel Core i9-13900F et AMD Ryzen 7 5700, les technologies des machines virtuelles et la technologie des processus.
Shared tests with results for both models: 1
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900F | AMD Ryzen 7 5700 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 445.083979 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 183.36283 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -58.8 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5700 | 5594.749887 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 8 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 178.739 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900F | 9449.652253 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.1 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 105.824 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |