Cuál es la mejor opción Intel Core i9-13900F o AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D? ¿Qué procesador es más rápido?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i9-13900F has a base frequency of 2.00 GHz (5.60 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Publicado en Q1/2023.
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D has a base frequency of 4.4 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 120 W. Publicado en 2023-02-28.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lugar en la clasificación general
(basado en varios puntos de referencia)
Más número de núcleos
12 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Posiciones comunes Intel Core i9-13900F CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Razones a tener en cuenta Posiciones comunes AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Intel Core i9-13900F
Información sobre los procesadores que se comparan, serie, generación y segmento de mercado.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
La gráfica interna no afecta al rendimiento de la CPU, realiza el trabajo de la tarjeta gráfica en su ausencia o en dispositivos móviles.
Códecs incorporados para codificar y descodificar contenidos. Acelera significativamente las operaciones necesarias.
Tipos, cantidad de canales de RAM soportados por AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D y Intel Core i9-13900F. Dependiendo de las placas base, pueden admitirse frecuencias de memoria más altas o más bajas.
Compara los requisitos del TDP Intel Core i9-13900F y AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Arquitectura, interfaces, instrucciones adicionales soportadas por Intel Core i9-13900F y AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D, tecnologías de máquinas virtuales y tecnología de procesos.
Shared tests with results for both models: 2
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900F | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 395.646202 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 388.704712 samples/min Submissions: 88 | -1.8 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 445.083979 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 397.901848 samples/min Submissions: 44 | -10.6 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 16179.397156 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 61.807 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900F | 9449.652253 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.1 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 105.824 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |