Cuál es la mejor opción Intel Core i5-12450H o Intel Core i5-13400F? ¿Qué procesador es más rápido?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i5-12450H has a base frequency of 2.00 GHz. 8 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. Publicado en Q1/2022.
Intel Core i5-13400F has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz). 10 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Publicado en Q1/2023.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
65 W
Posiciones comunes Intel Core i5-12450H CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lugar en la clasificación general
(basado en varios puntos de referencia)
lugar
Más número de núcleos
2 more cores
8
Posiciones comunes Intel Core i5-13400F CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Intel Core i5-12450H
Información sobre los procesadores que se comparan, serie, generación y segmento de mercado.
Intel Core i 13000
Intel Core i5
13
Intel Core i5-12400
Desktop / Server
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
6x Raptor Cove
4x Gracemont
-
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
10
16
Sí
No
-
-
2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz)
2.50 GHz (3.30 GHz)
La gráfica interna no afecta al rendimiento de la CPU, realiza el trabajo de la tarjeta gráfica en su ausencia o en dispositivos móviles.
-
-
-
-
None
-
-
-
-
-
-
Códecs incorporados para codificar y descodificar contenidos. Acelera significativamente las operaciones necesarias.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Tipos, cantidad de canales de RAM soportados por Intel Core i5-13400F y Intel Core i5-12450H. Dependiendo de las placas base, pueden admitirse frecuencias de memoria más altas o más bajas.
Sí
128 GB
2 (Dual Channel)
DDR5-4800
5.0 x 20
89.6 GB/s
Sí
Compara los requisitos del TDP Intel Core i5-12450H y Intel Core i5-13400F Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
65 W
117 W
Arquitectura, interfaces, instrucciones adicionales soportadas por Intel Core i5-12450H y Intel Core i5-13400F, tecnologías de máquinas virtuales y tecnología de procesos.
Alder Lake S Refresh
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
20 MB
20 MB
Q1/2023
LGA 1700
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Monolithic
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
Shared tests with results for both models: 8
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12450H | Intel Core i5-13400F | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 112.496374 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 196.492103 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +74.7 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 134.270491 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 199.355566 samples/min Submissions: 8 | +48.5 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 110.70322 samples/min Submissions: 34 | 200.318835 samples/min Submissions: 71 | +81.0 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 102.588353 samples/min Submissions: 21 | 194.431037 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +89.5 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 103.626894 samples/min Submissions: 35 | 185.751865 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +79.3 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 108.222767 samples/min Submissions: 59 | 180.143499 samples/min Submissions: 33 | +66.5 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 106.644675 samples/min Submissions: 45 | 198.561504 samples/min Submissions: 24 | +86.2 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 113.188249 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 191.443574 samples/min Submissions: 42 | +69.1 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | 5494.082873 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 14 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / B760M GAMING PLUS WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D99) Duration: 182.014 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12450H | 3526.453692 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 9 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Duration: 283.571 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Polish
Chinese
Korean
